Supreme Court Asks Madras HC To Decide Constitutional Validity Of Section 40(a)(iib) Of Income Tax Act
Live LawThe Supreme Court has directed the Madras High Court to decide the constitutional validity of Section 40 of the Income Tax Act.Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. had approached the Apex Court challenging the High Court order dismissing the writ petition filed by it challenging the validity of Section 40 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.This provision deals with disallowance. Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. had approached the Apex Court challenging the High Court order dismissing the writ petition filed by it challenging the validity of Section 40 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court, however, dismissed the said writ petition without deciding the validity of Section 40 of the Income Tax Act by observing that the issue of raising a challenge to the vires of the provision at this stage need not be entertained as the matter is still sub judice before the Income Tax Authority. The bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah observed: "When the vires of Section 40 of the Income Tax Act were challenged, which can be decided by the High Court alone in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court ought to have decided the issue with regard to vires of Section 40 on merits, irrespective of the fact whether the matter was sub judice before the Income Tax Authority.