Duchess of Sussex wins privacy claim against Mail on Sunday
The TelegraphHowever, media experts described it as "a bad day for press freedom," acknowledging that the case was widely expected to go to trial so the evidence could be tested. The ruling also means the testimony of four Buckingham Palace aides who said they could “shed light” on the issues at stake, as well as that of five of Meghan’s friends who spoke about her to People magazine, will not be heard. The lawyer said damages for the breach of privacy could be as high as £300,000 but that the award for the infringement of copyright could far exceed that because the Duchess is entitled to seek "an account of profits" - that is any profit made by Associated Newspapers as a result of articles using her letter to her father. Mr Justice Warby, who heard the summary judgment application over two days at the High Court, said the Duchess had a “reasonable expectation” that the contents of her five-page letter would remain private. “These are inherently private and personal matters.” The judge said the “only tenable justification” for publication would have been to correct some inaccuracies about the letter contained in an article in People magazine.