
Suit For Partition & Separate Possession Can't Be Rejected At Threshold On Ground Of Limitation: Karnataka High Court
Live LawThe Karnataka High Court has said that a suit for a primary relief of partition and separate possession cannot be rejected at the threshold citing Section 27 of the Limitation Act 1963. The petitioners herein contended that plaintiffs cannot deny the fact that they knew about execution of the relinquishment deed dated since 2016 and yet, the suit is filed after lapse of more than three years The High Court relied on Supreme Court's judgment in Vidya Devi alias Vidya Vati Vs. Prem Prakash and others where it was held that legislature has not prescribed any period of limitation for filing a suit for partition because partition an incident attached to the property and there is always a running cause of action for seeking partition by one of the co-sharers if and when he decides not to keep his share joint with other co-sharers. "Since filing of the suit is wholly dependent upon the will of the co-sharer, the period of limitation, specially the date or time from where such period would commence, could not have been possibly provided for by the legislature and, therefore, no such prescription is made in the law of limitation, as far as suits for partition are concerned." Then it opined, "Since filing of the suit is wholly dependent upon the will of the co-sharer, the period of limitation, specially the date or time from where such period would commence, could not have been possibly provided for by the legislature and, therefore, no such prescription is made in the law of limitation, as far as suits for partition are concerned."
History of this topic

Plea For Amendment To Partition Suit During Pendency Of Trial Cannot Be Denied On Technicalities: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Live Law
Special court for land-grab cases has no power to try IPC offences: Karnataka High Court
The Hindu
Assam Land and Revenue Regulation -Conferring Power To Execute Partition On Revenue Authorities Doesn't Bar Civil Court's Jurisdiction To Decide Rights : Supreme Court
Live Law
Right To Relief Lost: Karnataka High Court Dismisses Plea Filed After 44 Yrs Challenging Land Acquisition Proceedings From 1978
Live Law![[Forgery Of Will] Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Obliterated Merely Because An Issue Appears To Be Civil In Nature: Karnataka High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Forgery Of Will] Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Obliterated Merely Because An Issue Appears To Be Civil In Nature: Karnataka High Court
Live Law
S.125 CrPC | Daughter-In-Law Cannot Seek Maintenance From Parents-In-Law: Karnataka High Court
Live Law
Proposed Purchaser Of Joint Family Property Cannot Be Impleaded As Party Respondent In Suit For Partition: Karnataka High Court
Live Law![[Hindu Marriage Act] Wife's Failure To Comply With Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Decree Ground For Divorce: Karnataka High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Hindu Marriage Act] Wife's Failure To Comply With Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Decree Ground For Divorce: Karnataka High Court
Live Law
Distribution Of State Largesse Must Be Reasonable, Policies Cannot Be Construed By Keeping Common Sense In "Cold Storage": Karnataka High Court
Live Law
Properties Given As Dowry To Be Included In Partition Suit Instituted By Daughter Under Hindu Succession Act: Karnataka High Court
Live Law
Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: January 2022
Live Law
Order XII Rule 6 CPC| Application For Judgment On Admissions May Be Filed At Any Stage Of Suit: Karnataka High Court
Live LawDiscover Related














































