
Excess Salary Paid Due To Wrong Interpretation Of Rules Can't Be Taken Back From Retd Employee: J&K High Court Quashes Recovery Order
Live LawQuashing a recovery order passed by the Srinagar Development Authority directing a retired employee, Mohammad Ramzan Tantray, to return the excess amount paid due to a mistake in his pay scale upgrade the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court today ruled that recovery of excess amount paid to an employee due to a mistake or wrong interpretation of rules cannot be made. In allowing his plea Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal cited Syed Abdul Qadir v. State of Bihar, and observed, “the recovery of the excess amount made to the employee due to mistake or wrong interpretation of rules cannot be made” Background of the Case: Tantray was appointed as a daily wager to work as an orderly in 1976 and was temporarily appointed as a Chowkidar in 1981. Upon his retirement on March 31, 2014, the Examiner/CAO, Local Fund Audit and Pensions, issued a notice recommending recovery of the excess amount paid due to this upgradation, amounting to Rs. In absence of any specific stand by the respondents with regard to the upgradation of the petitioner, the impugned letter dated 15.10.2014 cannot sustain in the eyes of law” Commenting on the issue of recovery of an excess amount from an employee made due to a mistake or wrong interpretation of rules Justice Nargal referred to multiple Supreme Court judgments and emphasized the principle that recovery from employees, especially after retirement, causes undue hardship and is not permissible unless there was fraud or misrepresentation by the employee.
History of this topic

Employee Can't Be Denied Back Wages On Reinstatement When Rules Don't Provide 'No Pay' Punishment For Time Spent Out Of Service: Telangana HC
Live Law
EPF Pension | Kerala HC Restrains EPFO From Reducing Higher Pension Of Petitioners Who Contributed Based On Their Actual Salary
Live Law
Gratuity Cannot Be Forfeited For Employee Who Was Dismissed For Allegedly Misappropriating Funds Without Proper Proceedings: Karnataka HC
Live Law
'Recovery Of Excess Amount From Retired Employee For Period More Than Five Years Before Order Of Recovery Is Impermissible', Patna High Court
Live Law
Recovery Of Excess Pension Payments From Retired Class-III Employee Impermissible: Patna HC
Live Law
Employer Can't Deduct Excess Amount From Retiral Benefits Paid To Employee On Erroneous Fixation Of Pay Scale : Calcutta High Court
Live Law
'Employer Can't Recover Excess Amount For Period Extending 5 Years', Delhi High Court Reiterates
Live Law
Correctness Of Emoluments In Final 24 Months Before Retirement Is Indisputable For Retiral Benefits: J&K High Court
Live Law
State Not Entitled To Recover Excess Amount Paid To Retired Officer Due To Mistake On State's Part : Calcutta High Court
Live Law
State Not Entitled To Recover Excess Amount Paid To Retired Officer Due To Mistake On State's Part : Calcutta High Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Rejects State's Argument That It Has No Liability To Pay Retiral Benefits To Employee Of Aided Institution Whose Dismissal Was Set Aside
Live Law
Recovery Of Excess Payments Made To Retired Employee, Without Fraud Or Misrepresentation On Their Part, Is Impermissible : Calcutta High Court
Live Law
When Pay Scale Is Revised Retrospectively, Entitled Pensioners Must Be Given Benefits Even If They Retired Before Revision Order: Kerala HC
Live Law
Kerala University appellate tribunal orders arrest of Vellappally
New Indian Express
Unjustified To Recover From Employees Any Excess Payment, In Case Of Inordinate Delay In Initiating The Recovery: Madras High Court
Live Law
Blatant Violation: Karnataka HC Directs Payment Of Benefits To Retd Govt Employee Who Was Denied Pension Without Inquiry, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost
Live Law
Excess Payment Made To Govt Employee Without His Fault Can't Be Recovered From His Leave Encashment Benefits After Retirement: Orissa High Court
Live Law
Erring Officials To Be Held Accountable For Payment Of Cost "From Their Own Pockets" For Unnecessary Delay In Retiral Claims: Rajasthan High Court
Live Law
Calcutta High Court Directs State-Owned Corporation To Refund Overdrawn Amount Deducted From Group C Employee's Retiral Benefits
Live Law
Kerala High Court Deprecates 'Clever Attempts' Made By Qualified Persons To Establish Less Income In Maintenance Proceedings
Live Law
Whether Compulsory Retirement Warrants Reduction In Pension/ Gratuity To Be Decided At Time Of Imposing Punishment: Kerala HC
Live Law
Entitlement Of Employee To Salary/ Pension Is Intrinsic Part Of His Rights To Life & Property Under Articles 21 & 300A: Orissa High Court
Live Law
Parties To Litigation Entitled To Be Informed Of Reasons For Denial Of Their Claim : Kerala High Court
Live Law
SC Bars Contempt Actions Against EPFO For Implementation Of Employees Pension Proportional To Salary
Live Law
Supreme Court gives breather to govt, EPFO in pensions case
Hindustan Times
Motor Accident Compensation : SC To Consider If Retrospective Pay Revision Of Govt Employee After Death Should Be Taken Into Account
Live Law![Kerala Govt Brings Ordinance For Deferment Of Salary Payment In Public Emergencies [Read Ordinance]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2020/04/30/374017-kerala-secretariat.jpg)
Kerala Govt Brings Ordinance For Deferment Of Salary Payment In Public Emergencies [Read Ordinance]
Live Law![SC Relief To Employee 'Harassed' By Karnataka Govt By Withholding Of Pension [Read Orer]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2019/01/10/supreme-court-of-india.jpg)
SC Relief To Employee 'Harassed' By Karnataka Govt By Withholding Of Pension [Read Orer]
Live Law![Recovery After Retrospective Pay Revision Post-Retirement/Superannuation Not Permissible Under Law: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Bombay-Hc-4.jpg)
Recovery After Retrospective Pay Revision Post-Retirement/Superannuation Not Permissible Under Law: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Retired employee bound by undertaking to adjust any excess payment made to him: SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Supreme-Court-of-India.jpg)
Retired employee bound by undertaking to adjust any excess payment made to him: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Retired employee bound by undertaking to adjust any excess payment made to him: SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Supreme-Court-of-India.jpg)
Retired employee bound by undertaking to adjust any excess payment made to him: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Order of recovery of excessive payment made to employees would be impermissible in law if the mistake is detected after 5 years or if it is from Group C or D employees or from retired employees: SC...
Live Law
State cannot recover its dues from poor employees: Supreme Court
India TV NewsDiscover Related















































