SC/ST Act | Desirable To Outline Caste Related Utterances In FIR Or Chargesheet Before Subjecting Accused To Trial: Supreme Court
Live LawBefore subjecting an accused to a trial for alleged commission of offence under Section 3 of the the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989, it is desirable that the caste related utterances are outlined either in the FIR or, atleast, in the chargesheet, said the Supreme Court recently. “Since section 18 of the SC/ST Act bars invocation of the court’s jurisdiction under section 438, Cr.PC and having regard to the overriding effect of the SC/ST Act over other laws, it is desirable that before an accused is subjected to a trial for alleged commission of offence under section 3, the utterances made by him in any place within public view are outlined, if not in the F.I.R., but at least in the charge-sheet so as to enable the court to ascertain whether the charge sheet makes out a case of an offence under the SC/ST Act having been committed for forming a proper opinion in the conspectus of the situation before it, prior to taking cognisance of the offence.” A Bench comprising Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Justice Dipankar Datta expressed the aforementioned view while deciding a Special Leave Petition challenging the order of the Allahabad High Court whereby it had dismissed a application seeking quashing of criminal proceedings against the accused, who was alleged to have hurled caste abuses towards the complainant and his family members. The Court culled out the issues as under - whether it was at a place within public view that the appellant hurled caste related abuses at the complainant with an intent to insult or intimidate with an intent to humiliate him - The Court noted that the prosecution had relied on three witnesses. The situation becomes all the more glaring when in course of this proceeding the parties including the first respondent are unable to apprise us the outcome of the second F.I.R.” While allowing the petition, the Supreme Court observed - “We record that the High Court misdirected itself in failing to appreciate the challenge to the criminal proceedings including the charge-sheet in the proper perspective and occasioned a grave failure of justice in rejecting such challenge.” Case details Ramesh Chandra Vaishya v. State of Uttar Pradesh And Anr.| 2023 LiveLaw SC 469 | SLP No.