Availing Civil Remedy No Basis To Quash Criminal Proceedings When Facts Prima Facie Reveal Criminal Offence: Rajasthan High Court
Live LawThe Rajasthan High Court has reiterated that availing a civil remedy does not by itself become grounds to quash a criminal complaint filed concerning facts which not only make out a civil wrong but a criminal offence as well. The Court said: “Merely on account of the fact that complainant had a civil remedy as also has availed that remedy, the initiation of criminal motion against the petitioner may not be allowed to quash at the nascent stage of investigation in the impugned FIR.” A bench of Justice Sudesh Bansal was hearing a plea under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR filed against the petitioner. Ltd. v State of Kerala in which the following was observed: “It is true that a given set of facts may make out a civil wrong as also a criminal offence and only because a civil remedy may be available to the complainant that itself cannot be a ground to quash a criminal proceeding. The real test is whether the allegations in the complaint disclose the criminal offence of cheating or not.” Furthermore, the Court also observed that it had been settled by many Supreme Court cases that even though inherent powers of high court were of wide amplitude, these should be used sparingly in the rarest of rare cases.