Medical coding system leaves trans patients struggling to pay for care
LA TimesMany trans people such as Tim Chevalier, a software developer in Oakland, have trouble getting their health insurers to cover gender-affirming care. Some procedures that trans patients receive can also be excluded from coverage because insurance companies consider them “sex-specific.” For example, a transgender man’s gynecological visit may not be covered because his insurance plan covers those visits only for people enrolled as women. “There is always this question of: What gender should you tell the insurance company?” said Dr. Nick Gorton, an emergency medicine physician in Davis, Calif. Gorton, who is trans, recommends his patients with insurance plans that exclude trans care calculate the out-of-pocket costs that would be required for certain procedures based on whether the patient lists themselves as male or female on their insurance paperwork. For example, Gorton said, the question for a trans man becomes “what’s more expensive — paying for testosterone or paying for a Pap smear?” — since insurance likely won’t cover both. “It’s not hard usually to come up with five or seven or eight diagnoses for someone, because there’s lots of vague ones out there.” Implementing ICD-11 won’t fix all the coding problems, as insurance companies may still refuse to cover procedures related to gender incongruence even though it is listed as a sexual health condition.