SC's Privacy Judgment Casts Its Shadow Over WhatsApp's Data Sharing Policy Case [Read Order]
The WhatsApp Case, being heard by the five-Judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court, took an interesting turn today, with the Court and the counsel examining the impact of the recent landmark privacy judgment of the Court on the proceedings.At the outset, Madhavi Divan, counsel for the appellant, referred to the paragraphs in the privacy judgment, which have relevance in the. The WhatsApp Case, being heard by the five-Judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court, took an interesting turn today, with the Court and the counsel examining the impact of the recent landmark privacy judgment of the Court on the proceedings. Senior counsel, K.V.Vishwanathan, appearing for the impleaded party, referred to the paragraphs dealing with informational privacy in the privacy judgment which expressly noticed the concerns raised by the petitioner in this case. Facebook's counsel, Arvind Datar referred to Paragraph 136 in the Privacy judgment, to suggest that legislative intervention in data protection is required, in terms of the privacy judgment, as the issue is highly complex.

Mint Explainer: Why did NCLAT lift CCI ban on WhatsApp data-sharing practices?

Mint Explainer: Why the ban on WhatsApp's data-sharing practices has been stayed









As IRCTC Mulls Data Monetisation, There Is an Urgent Need for Data Privacy Rules









![Supreme Court Weekly Roundup [Jan 11 – Jan 17]](/static/images/error.jpg)

Traders' Body Moves SC Against WhatsApp's New Privacy Policy, Seeks its Roll Back

Whatsapp privacy case deferred to 18 Jan; judge recuses herself from hearing PIL
Discover Related

Meta expands 'Teen Accounts' to Facebook and Messenger

BJP IT cell chief claims infighting among Trinamool Congress MPs after 'WhatsApp chats' gets leaked

Big Tech is stifling startups, says CCI official

Can’t object to seizure on privacy grounds: ED

SC seeks details on compliance of hybrid hearing orders from states

Democratic Senators Call for Privacy Act Reform in Response to DOGE Takeover

‘X Corp’s plea misconceived and contrary to law’: Union government

SC upholds free speech, junks FIR against Congress MP for posting poem

SC rejects petition seeking to withhold order on its website

Elon Musk's X sues union government over alleged censorship and IT Act violations

NCLAT defers hearing on ₹213 Cr penalty for Meta

Recording court proceedings amounts to interfering with administration of justice: Kerala High Court

Elon Musk’s DOGE Likely Subject To Transparency Laws: Judge

Elon Musk's DOGE required to disclose agency records, rules federal judge
