Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Cannot Be Imported To Deal With Complaints U/S 138 Negotiable Instruments Act: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
1 year, 8 months ago

Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Cannot Be Imported To Deal With Complaints U/S 138 Negotiable Instruments Act: Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Live Law  

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has recently ruled that the provisions of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC cannot be imported to deal with a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. A bench of Justice Javed Iqbal Wani observed that Section 138 of the Act is quasi-criminal and, "The Magistrate could not have relied upon the aforesaid provisions of CPC while dealing with the case of a criminal offence under Section 138 of the Act which proceedings are regulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure". The Magistrate accordingly had acquitted the petitioner of the offences under section 138 of the NI Act by relying on the provisions of Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and directed that in case of breach of the order and non-payment of the agreed amount, the same would be recoverable under section 547 read with section 386 Cr.P.C. Expounding on the import of Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC to deal with the proceedings under Section 138 of NI Act Justice Wani observed that the nature of offence under Section 138 of the Act is quasi-criminal, in that, while in arises out of a civil wrong, the law however, imposes a criminal penalty in the form of imprisonment or fine.

History of this topic

Proceedings U/S 138 N.I. Act Justified In Cases Arising From Commercial Transactions Regardless Of Their Civil Nature: J&K High Court
5 months, 1 week ago
[O.38 R.5 CPC] Plaintiff Can't Use Provision As Tool For Coercion Or Easy Execution Of Decrees: J&K High Court
9 months ago
S.138 NI Act | Proceedings For Cheque Dishonour Be Quashed Once Complainant Signs Deed Accepting Amount In Full & Final Settlement: Supreme Court
1 year ago
Accused Has Right To Be Heard In Revision Challenging Dismissal Of Complaint: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Restoring Complaint
1 year, 1 month ago
Order 23 Rule 3(A) - Bar On Filing New Suits Only Applicable To Parties Involved In Compromise Decrees, Not To Strangers: J&K High Court
1 year, 2 months ago
Consumer Commission Can Revive Cases Consigned To Records, Does Not Qualify As Review Or Recall: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
1 year, 2 months ago
Order XXI CPC | Failure To Raise Objections Before Proclamation Of Sale Not Bar To Challenge An Irregular Sale: Kerala High Court
1 year, 4 months ago
Well Reasoned Interim Order Of Arbitral Tribunal, Courts Should Not Interfere Under Section 37 Of The A&C Act : Delhi HC
1 year, 5 months ago
Proceedings Before Mediator Confidential, Parties Can't Be Compelled To Abide By Offers Made During Negotiations: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
1 year, 9 months ago
Inadvertence To Produce Document Not Substantial Cause To Invoke Order XLI Rule 27 CPC: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
1 year, 9 months ago
Order 23 Rule 3 CPC | Vitiated Compromise Decree Can Be Recalled By Same Court, Separate Suit Challenging Such Decree Is Barred: J&K&L High Court
2 years, 3 months ago
CrPC | Order Of Maintenance Does Not Get Wiped Out Because Of Settlement During Pendency Of Execution Proceedings: J&K&L High Court
2 years, 5 months ago
"Section 89 CPC Extends To Compromises Entered Outside Court Also": Punjab & Haryana High Court Allows Refund Of Court Fees
2 years, 8 months ago
Procedure U/S 203 CrPC Duly Followed: Gujarat High Court Refuses To Quash Trial Court Order Dismissing Private Complaint
2 years, 10 months ago
Section 138 NI Act: Complaint Cannot Be Proceeded With Once The Accused And Complainant Enter Into A Settlement Agreement: Supreme Court
3 years, 3 months ago
S. 96(3) CPC- Bar On Appeal Against Compromise Decree Not Applicable Where Court Declines To Record Some Part Of Compromise: Allahabad HC
5 years, 3 months ago

Discover Related