
Governor Can't Punish Guilty Govt Official By Dismissal Under Rules, Can Only Withhold/Withdraw Pension For Misconduct: Madhya Pradesh HC
Live LawWhile setting aside a dismissal order of a retired government official, the Indore Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court concluded that under the state civil service pension rules the Governor can only withhold or withdraw the officer's pension for grave misconduct/negligence but cannot impose punishment of dismissal. Referring to the provisions of the MP Civil Services Rules, 1976A single judge bench of Justice Vivek Rusia observed, “In view of Rule 9 if any government employee has been found guilty in a judicial proceeding and any departmental proceeding of a grave misconduct or negligence, the only punishment which can be imposed by the Governor is withholding or withdrawing the pension or part thereof, permanently or for a specified period. The counsel for the petitioner contended that after retirement even if the departmental proceedings continues, under Rule 9 of the state Civil Services, Rules, the enquiry report is liable to be sent to the Governor with its finding and under Rule 9 the Governor is the competent authority to pass an order in respect of withholding or withdrawing the pension or part thereof. Civil Services, Rules, 1976 the authority who initiated the enquiry, is directed to send this enquiry report to the Governor for passing an appropriate order,” the Court said.
History of this topic

Dismissal From Service Bars Pensionary Benefits Under Punjab Civil Services Rules: Punjab & Haryana HC
Live Law
Karnataka HC questions state govt over withholding civic staffer’s pension
New Indian Express
Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Withheld For An Indeterminate Period On Ground Of Lack Of Resources: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Live Law
Maharashtra Civil Services Rules | Penalty Of Reduction In Pay Scale Doesn't Extend Beyond Period Of Employment, Impact Post-Retirement Benefits: High Court
Live Law
Contracts Of Employment Not Specifically Enforceable When There Is No Element Of Statutory Governance: Madhya Pradesh High Court Reiterates
Live Law
Railway Service Rules | Employee Compulsorily Retired From Service As Penalty Has No Vested Right To Claim Entire Pension Or Gratuity: Kerala HC
Live Law![Kerala HC Dismisses Challenge Against Compulsory Retirement Of Judicial Officer [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Kerala HC Dismisses Challenge Against Compulsory Retirement Of Judicial Officer [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Right To Retire Can’t Be Superior To Right To Life, SC Upholds UP Govt Decision Denying Voluntary Retirement To Doctors [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Right To Retire Can’t Be Superior To Right To Life, SC Upholds UP Govt Decision Denying Voluntary Retirement To Doctors [Read Judgment]
Live Law![SC Upholds Patna HC Order Quashing ‘Compulsory Retirement’ Of Judicial Officer Without Any Disciplinary Enquiry [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
SC Upholds Patna HC Order Quashing ‘Compulsory Retirement’ Of Judicial Officer Without Any Disciplinary Enquiry [Read Order]
Live Law
‘Pension cannot be denied without authority by law’
Hindustan TimesDiscover Related









































![[MV Act] Family Pension Paid To Deceased's Family Can't Be Deducted While Calculating Compensation: Delhi High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)



