The Ambedkar riddle: Where he fits into the Hindutva movement
Op IndiaA barely 10-second clip of Home Miniter Amit Shah was circulated a couple of days ago, falsely claiming that he insulted BR Ambedkar – the hottest currency in political markets for a while now – and the nation has since been debating who loves Ambedkar more. And that’s why Rahul Gandhi flashed Manusmriti in the parliament – he could not have quoted Ambedkar to directly attack the BJP, RSS or even Hindutva. In fact, via the 22 vows he created and took when he changed his religion, he made it more than apparent that not only did he not want to be identified as Hindu, but he went on to create an identity that was primarily “against Hinduism” rather than Buddhist or anything else – after all, the vows included things like no pind daan, no faith in Lord Ram or Krishna, renouncing Hinduism in full as ‘harmful to society’ etc. ‘Ambedkar was a reformer’ Hindutva, not as defined by JNU jholachhaps or champagne intellectuals, but as defined by Savarkar and practised by Sangh, is indeed a liberal reformist movement around Hinduism. For example, in Annihilation of Caste, which arguably is one of the most stringent attacks on traditional Hinduism by Ambedkar, he says, “I am told that for such religious principles as will be in consonance with liberty, equality and fraternity, it may not be necessary for you to borrow from foreign sources and that you could draw for such principles on the Upanishads.” Further, some have argued that many other ‘reformists’ from the same era were not too kind on traditional shastras or even non-Vedic gods, such as folks from Arya Samaj and Brahmo Samaj.