Displacement fears
Apparently, in India the rights of people living in and around national parks and sanctuaries are ignored, while the rest of the world moves towards policies that reconcile wildlife conservation with human rights and justice. You are requested to ensure strict compliance of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order so that none of the above prohibited activities are allowed to be undertaken in protected areas". ATREE and other organisations have shown that in the case of three medicinal plants in the Biligiri Sanctuary, such activities by the local Adivasis are not ecologically detrimental; this would be the case of many resource uses by local populations across India's protected areas, so there simply is no justification for making such a blanket prohibition. A clarification should be sought from the Supreme Court in order to permit the continuation of traditional bona fide and livelihood activities by communities within protected areas, as customary rights.
Discover Related

India Sets Ambitious Biodiversity Goals, Aims to Protect 30% of Land and Ocean Areas

Project Tiger to displace 5.5 lakh tribals, says rights group report

India's Tribal Land: Can Both Development & Conservation Be Andaman's Priority?

Analysis | Why has the creation of eco-sensitive zones provoked protests?

Where the wild things are: Take a walk inside India’s private forests

Conservation requires some amount of human presence on ground

India rolls back environmental regulations during the pandemic

Shrinking sanctuary: 90 per cent of protected lands are isolated from one another

How does India’s tiger conservation policy impact the local people and the forest?
