Bar Against Hearing Of Election Disputes By Courts U/A 329 Prevails Over High Court's Powers U/A 226 Of Constitution: Andhra Pradesh High Court
3 years, 8 months ago

Bar Against Hearing Of Election Disputes By Courts U/A 329 Prevails Over High Court's Powers U/A 226 Of Constitution: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Live Law  

In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that the bar against hearing of election disputes by Courts under Article 329 of the Constitution shall prevail over the High Court's powers to issue writs under Article 226 of the Constitution. Refusing to interfere in the election process, the Bench observed, "Bar for entertaining an election dispute under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not a self-imposed restriction like existence of alternate statutory remedy. The Petitioner in this case had argued that the bar under Article 329 of the Constitution of India is not an absolute one and in exceptional cases where the election process has degenerated into a travesty of democracy due to use of high-handed muscle power and inaction of the Election authorities, the Court is not powerless to intervene and issue appropriate directions to activate the authorities concerned and salvage the election process. However, the Division Bench observed that the Petitioner's argument is fallacious inasmuch as the decision of the Election Commission not to hold a re-poll is clearly a part of its "superintendence of the election process" and falls within the expression 'election' under Article 329 of the Constitution of India.

History of this topic

Supreme Court Refuses To Stay Upcoming Punjab Municipal Corporation Elections, Issues Notice To SEC On Opposition Candidates' Plea
2 weeks, 6 days ago
[Maharashtra Elections] Court Can Interfere In Electoral Process Only To Progress And Further It: HC Denies Relief To Candidate Over Rejected Nomination
Trending News
1 month, 4 weeks ago
Bombay HC upholds election nomination rules, rejects plea for ballot reinstatement
1 month, 4 weeks ago
We Don't Operate In A Totalitarian State, Govt Can't Exercise Blanket Power Over Every Institution Under The Sun: Calcutta High Court
7 months, 4 weeks ago
Can't Exercise Writ Jurisdiction To Interfere In Election Process Once It Has Commenced: Andhra Pradesh High Court
2 years, 8 months ago
Delhi High Court Directs Election Commission To Respond On Plea For Regulation Of Internal Elections In Political Parties Within 2 Weeks
2 years, 8 months ago
Labour Court Amenable To High Court's Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227, Not Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Andhra Pradesh High Court
2 years, 9 months ago
Article 227 - High Court Cannot Go Deep Into Factual Issues Like An Appellate Body : Supreme Court
2 years, 9 months ago
Difference Between Article 226 & Article 227 Of Constitution: Gujarat High Court Explains
2 years, 11 months ago
Power Of Judicial Review Under Article 226 Is Basic Feature Of Constitution; Can't Be Curtailed By Any Legislation: Rajasthan High Court
2 years, 11 months ago
Petition Styled As One Under Article 226 Would Not Bar High Court To Exercise Its Jurisdiction Which Otherwise It Possesses: Supreme Court
3 years, 9 months ago
Howsoever Erroneous Rejection Of Nomination Is, Judicial Intervention Not Contemplated At Intermediate Stage Of Election: Kerala High Court
3 years, 9 months ago
High Courts Have Power To Grant Bail By Invoking Article 226 In Suitable Cases: Supreme Court
4 years, 1 month ago
Scope Of Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India: Important Judgments [Part-2]
5 years, 7 months ago
Scope Of Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India: Important Judgments [Part-1]
5 years, 7 months ago
Writ Petitions In Contract Matters Maintainable When There Is Arbitrariness By The State: SC [Read Order]
5 years, 9 months ago

Discover Related