Supreme Court Disposes PIL Seeking Free Vaccination; Grants Liberty To Petitioner To Assist In Suo Motu Case
Live LawThe bench headed by Justice D. Y. Chandrachud noted that the instant petition was filed by Social Democratic Party of India on May 10 in the midst of the second wave of the pandemic and that by the order of May 31 of the Supreme Court in its suo motu cognisance of the COVID-related issues, the concerns of the petitioner-in-person have been taken care of. Out of the several concerns expressed by a bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, L Nageswara Rao and S Ravindra Bhat with the 'Liberalized Vaccination Policy', the two prominent ones were : The dual pricing and procurement policy which forces states to directly procure vaccines from private manufacturers at a price fixed by them. Even as late as on May 31, the Centre maintained before the Supreme Court that 'all is well' with the vaccination policy, with the Solicitor General of India attempting to create a positive impression by mentioning the possibility of success in talks with foreign vaccine manufacturers. It may be recalled that in its April 30 order, the Supreme Court detailed several constitutional lacunae with the vaccine policy and went to the extent of prima facie saying that it was "detrimental to the right to life and health" and that it needs a rethink to "make it conform to the mandate of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India". Therefore, we believe that the Central Government should consider revisiting its current vaccine policy to ensure that it withstands the scrutiny of Articles 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution" - says the April 30 order of Supreme Court.