Column: What the Republicans forcing a government shutdown have in common with 1960s radicals
LA TimesThis week, yet another government shutdown appears inevitable because a sizable chunk of the House Freedom Caucus believes, in the words of Tim Matheson in “Animal House,” that “this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody’s part.” What situation? When you’ve convinced yourself that the “system,” “establishment” or “regime” is irretrievably corrupt or some kind of existential enemy — a common conviction among numerous countercultures for millennia — any form of deal is seen as evidence that you’ve “sold out.” The only way to irrefutably demonstrate that you didn’t compromise your principles — whatever those might be — is to lose. It’s akin to declaring, “Do what I demand or I will repeatedly smash my hand with this hammer until you relent.” Or maybe it’s like 1960s student radicals occupying the Berkeley or Kenyon cafeteria demanding better library hours, more parking and a complete withdrawal of U.S. forces from Vietnam. On social media, he posted, “ UNLESS YOU GET EVERYTHING, SHUT IT DOWN!” Of course, Trump wants to use a government shutdown to “ defund ” the federal prosecutions against him and “other patriots.” Even if you thought this radical asininity were a great idea, the idea that it could make it through a Democratic-controlled Senate and past the president’s veto is a childish fantasy.