Employees Can't Be Regularized If Employment Was Based On Outsourcing Contracts, Not Intended To Create Permanent Employment: Karnataka High Court
Live LawA single judge bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising of Justice N S Sanjay Gowda, while deciding Writ Petition in the case of Uemsha T N and Ors vs. State of Karnataka, held that employees cannot be granted permanent status if their employment was through outsourcing contracts that were not meant to establish permanent positions. Background Facts The Employees are group of 27 workers who were employed as binders and later as printers starting from the year 2000 at the Government Printing Press in Tumkur. On the other hand, it was contended by the State that the employees were never directly employed by the Government Printing Press. Findings of the Court The Court observed that the employees were engaged through contractors and were not directly employed by the Government Printing Press.
History of this topic
Two Decades Of Continuous Services Doesn't Give Right Of Regularization Unless Formal Recruitment Process Is Followed: J&K High Court
Live Law
Two Decades Of Continuous Services Doesn't Give Right Of Regularization Unless Formal Recruitment Process Is Followed: J&K High Court
Live Law
Karnataka High Court expresses concern over ‘exploitation of human labour’ by State government
The Hindu
Long-Term Contract Employment Cannot Override Regular Recruitment Process; Bombay HC
Live Law
Regularisation of contract faculty jobs to await govt plea: Telangana HC
Deccan Chronicle
Regularise Contract Staff, HC Orders Police Housing Corporation
Deccan Chronicle
Deprived Workers Of Their Dues: Karnataka High Court Directs Mysore Electrical To Reinstate Employees Unilaterally Shifted To Contractual Engagement
Live Law
Continued Employment In Public Service Projects For Several Years Creates Rights On Employees: Madras HC Directs State To Frame Regularization Scheme
Live LawDiscover Related