Mere Breach Of Contract Cannot Constitute Cheating Unless Dishonest Intention Is Shown At Beginning Of Transaction: Delhi High Court
4 months, 1 week ago

Mere Breach Of Contract Cannot Constitute Cheating Unless Dishonest Intention Is Shown At Beginning Of Transaction: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has observed that a mere breach of contract does not give rise to criminal prosecution of cheating unless a fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown at the beginning of the transaction. It stated that a mere breach of contract cannot give rise to a criminal cheating case unless dishonest intention is shown. Subsequent conduct of the alleged cannot be a sole test, and a mere breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating unless the fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction, that is the time when the offence is said to have been committed.” The Court emphasised that for Section 420 IPC, 'intention' is the gist of offence. 701), where the Supreme Court observed that that mere breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating unless the fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction.

History of this topic

Mere Breach Of Land Sale Contract Not Enough To Prosecute For Cheating Without 'Dishonest Intention' While Making Promise: Gauhati HC
1 week, 6 days ago
Mere Breach Of Contract Can't Be Basis For Criminal Case For Cheating : Supreme Court
2 years ago
Supreme Court Monthly Criminal Digest August 2022 (Citations 647 - 726)
2 years, 6 months ago
Mere Breach Of Contract Cannot Give Rise To Criminal Prosecution For Cheating: Supreme Court
3 years ago
Mere Breach Of Contract Not Cheating; Giving Criminal Colour To Civil Disputes Must Be Discouraged: Supreme Court
3 years, 4 months ago

Discover Related