
Preferential Treatment In Selection Based On Present Place Of Posting Discriminatory, Violates Right To Equality: Rajasthan High Court
Live LawRajasthan High Court has ruled that Rajasthan Government's decision to grant bonus marks in teacher selection exam to those opting for posting in the districts in which they were currently posted in government employment was not only against the statutory rules but also violative of Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India. “The offending part of Condition No.9 of the The Court was hearing a bunch of petitions against Condition 9 in the It was argued by the petitioners that there was no provision for granting bonus marks under the Rajasthan Civil Services Rules, 2023 and without there being any such provision, the condition was not in consonance with the Rules. The Court perused the entire scheme of selection under the Rules and opined that there was no indication of such a provision that allowed granting of bonus marks as per the Condition in the It was highlighted that it was a settled principle that if there was a conflict between the terms and conditions of any “no distinction has been made by the Rule making authority between different personnel, posted in different schools, in different districts of the State of Rajasthan… Hence, the act of granting 10 additional bonus marks to personnel of a particular district is arbitrary, wholly unjustified and contrary to the scheme of Rules of 2023. It is not possible to compartmentalize the State into Districts with a view to offer employment to the residents of that District on a preferential basis.” In this background, the Court held that the provision of granting bonus marks to a particular group of personnel of the district, if they opted their present place/district of posting, was violative of Articles 14, 15 and 16 when tested on the anvil of Right to Equality and it created a class of un-equals amongst equals.
History of this topic

Benefit Of Reservation In Promotion Available To All Under Article 16(4A), J&K Citizens Cannot Be Treated Differently: High Court
Live Law
Denying Regularization From Correct Date By Making Distinction Based On Initial Nature Of Work Arbitrary, Violates Art. 14, 16: Rajasthan HC
Live Law
Promotion As District Judges Under Merit-cum-Seniority Quota Can't Be Denied To Suitable Candidates Based On Merit List : Supreme Court
Live Law
Filing Of Repeated, Identical Petitions Is A Serious Menace To Administration Of Justice: Rajasthan HC Imposes Costs On Petitioners
Live Law
Mere Eligibility Does Not Confer Any Right Of Promotion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reiterates
Live Law
Percentage Of Disability Less Than The Benchmark Level Would Not Render Meritorious Disabled Candidate Unfit For Job: Rajasthan High Court
Live Law
Discrepancy In Document Submission, Rajasthan High Court Directs To Accept Based On Merit Of Candidate
Live Law
NEET | Merit Exclusive Criteria To Allocate College, Technical Formalities Can't Frustrate Fundamental Rights Of Meritorious Candidates: Rajasthan HC
Live Law
When Selection Criteria Is Mentioned On Website, Non-Mentioning In Advertisement For Post Does Not Vitiate Selection Process: Rajasthan HC
Live Law
Procedural And Technical Hurdles Cannot Impede Substantial Justice: Rajasthan HC Grants Appointment To Candidate Who Erred In Submitting Application
Live Law
Denying Govt Appointment Solely Due To Pending Criminal Case Not Involving Moral Turpitude Is Unjust And Arbitrary: Rajasthan HC
Live Law
Govt Cannot Disqualify Candidate Based Grounds Which Are Not Mentioned In Advertisement For Job Post: Rajasthan High Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Approves HC Order Quashing Haryana Govt Decision To Grant Extra Marks To Certain Domiciles In Recruitment Tests
Live Law
Supreme Court To Hear On Jun 24 Haryana SSC's Plea Against Quashing Of Notification Granting 5% Addl Marks To State Domiciles In CET
Live Law
Application for public posts: SC junks plea against Rajasthan rules for candidates with more than 2 kids
Hindustan Times
Rajasthan High Court Upholds Benefit Of Probation To Two Convicts, Says Complainant Has No Right To Seek Enhancement Of Sentence
Live Law
Negative Discrimination Can't Be Claimed Under Articles 14 & 16 Referring To Persons Erroneously Regularized: Supreme Court
Live Law
Recruitments To Posts Of Over 2300 Elementary Trained Teachers In Punjab Set Aside By Punjab & Haryana High Court
Live Law
District Judge Direct Recruitment At Rajasthan
Live Law![No Reservation In Promotions Without Examining Adequacy Of Representation In Promotional Posts : SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
No Reservation In Promotions Without Examining Adequacy Of Representation In Promotional Posts : SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Rajasthan HC Dismisses Appeal On Interlocking Reservation For Vacant Posts [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Rajasthan HC Dismisses Appeal On Interlocking Reservation For Vacant Posts [Read Judgment]
Live Law![No reservation for disabled in promotional posts: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
No reservation for disabled in promotional posts: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related















































