Why aren’t we calling the Pittsburgh shooting ‘terrorism’?
6 years, 5 months ago

Why aren’t we calling the Pittsburgh shooting ‘terrorism’?

Al Jazeera  

A white gunman walks into a synagogue outside of Pittsburgh and guns down 11 congregants after screaming, “All Jews must die!” during Sabbath services. “Whites don’t shoot whites,” reveals another gunman, amid a racially motivated shooting outside of a Kentucky grocery store that left two elderly Black customers dead. Yet, despite the racially and religiously-driven murders that unfolded in Pittsburgh and Kentucky, and the politically motivated mass violence prevented out of Florida, the words “terror” or “terrorism” were seldom used in the media coverage of these three incidents. Certainly, one would presume that a Muslim or Arab culprit involved in any of one of three incidents would immediately trigger suspicion of terrorism. These culprits are routinely dubbed “lone wolves” or mere “violent gunmen,” labels that exempt them from the charge of terrorism in the minds of Americans, and the public imagination at large.

History of this topic

How 9/11 made politicians and media turn terrorism into an Islamic issue
3 years, 6 months ago
Jamia and Shaheen Bagh shootings: It's deeply worrying that the word 'terrorist' is absent from popular discourse
5 years, 2 months ago
It's vital to find the root cause of terrorism
7 years, 4 months ago
Las Vegas shooting was not an act of terror, say police: Is 'terrorist' label selectively applied to Indian Muslims?
7 years, 5 months ago
Las Vegas shooting doesn't classify as 'terrorism'; Donald Trump's refusal to call it so is justified
7 years, 5 months ago
Terrorism, race, religion: Defining the Las Vegas shooting
7 years, 5 months ago
Why the Quebec mosque shooting happened
8 years, 2 months ago
When terror isn’t terrorism
8 years, 7 months ago
Call it terrorism in Charleston
9 years, 9 months ago

Discover Related