High Court Can't Ordinarily Reappreciate Evidence In Article 226 Proceedings : Supreme Court
1 day, 18 hours ago

High Court Can't Ordinarily Reappreciate Evidence In Article 226 Proceedings : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court reiterated that the High Court cannot reappreciate the evidence unless the appropriate Court has exceeded its jurisdiction or acted perversely. “It is a well-established principle that the High Court, while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot reappreciate the evidence and arrive at a finding of facts unless the authorities below had either exceeded its jurisdiction or acted perversely.,” held Justices Sanjay Karol and CT Ravikumar. Further, the High Court had also set aside the order of permanent injunction against the respondent. The Apex Court “deprecated” the manner in which the same was set aside and observed: “Second, that an order granting a permanent injunction, with the authority having given its independent and anxious consideration, cannot be set aside in such a cursory and callous manner, more so under the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court.

History of this topic

High Court's Interference Under Article 226/227 Permissible Only If Arbitral Tribunal's Order Is Patently Perverse : Supreme Court
5 days, 16 hours ago
When Can High Courts Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 Despite Existence Of Statutory Remedies? Supreme Court Explains
8 months, 4 weeks ago
S.58 UPVAT | In Revisional Jurisdiction, HC Must Uphold Sanctity Of Judgments/Orders, Must Intervene Only When There Are Compelling Reasons: Allahabad HC
9 months ago
Article 226 | High Court Ought To Relegate Parties To Alternate Remedies When There Are Serious Factual Disputes: Supreme Court
1 year, 2 months ago
[Prof GN Saibaba Case] 'Matter Be Remanded To High Court To Decide All Issues Afresh’: Saibaba’s Counsel To Supreme Court
1 year, 8 months ago
CPC Order 41 Rule 23A - Appellate Court Can't Remand Suit For De Novo Trial Merely Because A Particular Evidence Has Not Been Adduced : Supreme Court
1 year, 10 months ago
Courts Ought To Refrain From Interfering With Findings Of Facts In Departmental Inquiries Unless There Are Exceptional Circumstances: Supreme Court
2 years, 1 month ago
Further Investigation/Reinvestigation Can Be Ordered By High Court Under Section 482 CrPC In Appropriate Cases: Supreme Court
2 years, 2 months ago
Article 226 | Court Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Already Considered By Departmental Authorities: Delhi High Court
2 years, 5 months ago
Article 227 - High Court Cannot Go Deep Into Factual Issues Like An Appellate Body : Supreme Court
2 years, 9 months ago
Mere Wrong Decision Without Anything More Not Enough To Attract Jurisdiction Under Article 227: Delhi High Court
2 years, 10 months ago
Article 226 - High Court Not Required To Reappreciate Evidence Or Interfere With Findings Recorded By Disciplinary Authority: Supreme Court
2 years, 10 months ago
High Court In An Appeal U/Sec 374(2) CrPC Has To Independently Evaluate Entirety Of Evidence: Supreme Court
3 years, 1 month ago
First Appellate Court Should Deal With All Issues And Evidence And Follow Procedure Under CPC: Supreme Court
3 years, 3 months ago
Second Appeal- High Courts Can Exercise Limited Factual Review Under Section 103 CPC: Supreme Court
3 years, 3 months ago
Second Appeal- Question Of Law Doesn't Arise In Abstract; Mere Reference To Facts Does Not Amount To Reappreciation Of Evidence: Supreme Court
3 years, 4 months ago
Supreme Court Expresses Concerns Of Judicial Propriety, Discipline Over P&H High Court Entertaining Fresh Plea When Proceedings Before It Pending
3 years, 4 months ago
Alternative Remedy And Supervisory Jurisdiction Of High Courts Under Article 227 Of Constitution
5 years, 2 months ago
Section 482 Cr.P.C :Recent Supreme Court Judgments
5 years, 6 months ago
SC Again Reminds High Courts About Limitations While Considering Second Appeals [Read Judgment]
5 years, 9 months ago

Discover Related