High Court Can't Ordinarily Reappreciate Evidence In Article 226 Proceedings : Supreme Court
Live LawThe Supreme Court reiterated that the High Court cannot reappreciate the evidence unless the appropriate Court has exceeded its jurisdiction or acted perversely. “It is a well-established principle that the High Court, while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot reappreciate the evidence and arrive at a finding of facts unless the authorities below had either exceeded its jurisdiction or acted perversely.,” held Justices Sanjay Karol and CT Ravikumar. Further, the High Court had also set aside the order of permanent injunction against the respondent. The Apex Court “deprecated” the manner in which the same was set aside and observed: “Second, that an order granting a permanent injunction, with the authority having given its independent and anxious consideration, cannot be set aside in such a cursory and callous manner, more so under the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court.