Explained | Content moderation on Wikipedia
The story so far: On Tuesday, India summoned officials of Wikipedia, in response to cricketer Arshdeep Singh’s Wikipedia page being edited with misleading information that stated he was a “khalistani”. Although Wikimedia’s terms of use state that it “generally does not contribute, monitor or delete content” there are ways in which the Wikimedia Foundation exerts control over Wikipedia. In case volunteer editors do not make suitable edits, Wikimedia, as per its terms of use states that it can “contribute, monitor or delete content” for legal compliance. Therefore, in the Indian context, even if the Wikimedia Foundation does not own the information hosted on Wikipedia, once Wikimedia Foundation has “actual knowledge” of such content being hosted on its platform, it would be held responsible for the same. In this case while neither has happened, Wikipedia administrators and editors have removed the distortion from Arshdeep Singh’s page and granted it certain protection such that only “trusted editors” can edit the page.

Discover Related

Tragedy of a commons: on Wikimedia and the free flow of information

Wikipedia under Centre’s scrutiny for complaints of biased and inaccurate information

On ANI’s defamation suit against Wikipedia | Explained

Wikipedia could soon be banned in UK over upcoming age verification rules

Pakistan unblocks Wikipedia, days after restricting site over 'blasphemous' content

Wikipedia ban in Pakistan over alleged blasphemous content lifted

Wikimedia Foundation urges Pakistan to restore access to Wikipedia

Saudi Arabia govt agents infiltrated Wikipedia to control content

The Hunt for Wikipedia's Disinformation Moles

Here’s how Wikipedia plans to tackle misinformation, harassment on its platform

Wikipedia introduces global rules to combat site abuses, misbehaviour
