![An Unavoidable Conundrum in Section 360 Of BNSS [Withdrawal From Prosecution]](/static/images/error.jpg)
An Unavoidable Conundrum in Section 360 Of BNSS [Withdrawal From Prosecution]
Live LawWithdrawal from prosecution -The Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of a case may, with the consent of the Court, at any time before the judgment is pronounced, withdraw from the prosecution of any person either generally or in respect of any one or more of the offences for which he is tried; and, upon such withdrawal,— if it is made before a charge has been framed, the accused shall be discharged in respect of such offence or offences; if it is made after a charge has been framed, or when under this Sanhita no charge is required, he shall be acquitted in respect of such offence or offences: Provided that where such offence-- was against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends; or was investigated under any Central Act; or involved the misappropriation or destruction of, or damage to, any property belonging to the Central Government; or was committed by a person in the service of the Central Government while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, and the Prosecutor in charge of the case has not been appointed by the Central Government, he shall not, unless he has been permitted by the Central Government to do so, move the Court for its consent to withdraw from the prosecution and the Court shall, before according consent, direct the Prosecutor to produce before it the permission granted by the Central Government to withdraw from the prosecution: Provided further that no Court shall allow such withdrawal without giving an opportunity of being heard to the victim in the case. Withdrawal from prosecution - The Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of a case may, with the consent of the Court at any time before the judgment is pronounced, withdraw from the prosecution of any person either generally or in respect of any one or more of the offences for which he is tried; and upon such withdrawal,-- If it is made before a charge has been framed, the accused shall be discharged in respect of such offence or offences; if it is made after a charge has been framed, or when under this Code no charge is required he shall be acquitted in respect of such offence or offences: Provided that where such offence-- was against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends, or was investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, or involved the misappropriation or destruction of, or damage to, any property belonging to the Central Government, or was committed by a person in the service of the Central Government while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, and the prosecutor in charge of the case has not been appointed by the Central Government he shall not, unless he has been permitted by the Central Government to do so, move the Court for its consent to withdraw from the prosecution and the Court shall, before according consent, direct the Prosecutor to produce before it the permission granted by the Central Government to withdraw from the prosecution.
History of this topic

S.138 NI Act | Trial Can Proceed In Absence Of Accused If He Neither Enters Appearance Nor Seeks Exemption From Personal Attendance: Bombay HC
Live Law
Sessions Court Sets Aside Conviction Of Chartered Accountant In 38 Years Old Case Over Smuggling Of Foreign Currency Worth ₹46 Lakh
Live Law![Issue Of Invalidity Of Sanction To Be Raised During Trial, Not At Stage Of Discharge Application: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Issue Of Invalidity Of Sanction To Be Raised During Trial, Not At Stage Of Discharge Application: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Prosecution For ‘Amorphous And Transitory’ Charge With ‘Conjectural Or Hypothetical’ Evidence Not Possible: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Prosecution For ‘Amorphous And Transitory’ Charge With ‘Conjectural Or Hypothetical’ Evidence Not Possible: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Govt Can’t Withdraw Criminal Cases In Whimsical, Arbitrary Manner: Allahabad HC (FB) [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Govt Can’t Withdraw Criminal Cases In Whimsical, Arbitrary Manner: Allahabad HC (FB) [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Prosecution For Offence Under Sec. 182 IPC Without Formal Complaint By Public Servant Void Ab Initio: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Prosecution For Offence Under Sec. 182 IPC Without Formal Complaint By Public Servant Void Ab Initio: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Prosecution Sanction – A Former Judge Pleads Guilty
Live Law
Prosecution Sanction – A Former Judge Pleads Guilty
Live Law![Breaking: Erring Prosecutors And Investigating Officers Must Be Proceeded Against In Case Of Unmerited Acquittals And Wrongful Convictions; SC [Download Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Breaking: Erring Prosecutors And Investigating Officers Must Be Proceeded Against In Case Of Unmerited Acquittals And Wrongful Convictions; SC [Download Judgment]
Live Law
Verdict reserved on plea against withdrawal of Quattrocchi prosecution
The HinduDiscover Related

























![[Prevention Of Corruption Act] CBI Can File Final Report Even If No Offence Is Revealed During Probe: Kerala High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)














![[NDPS Act] Not For Accused To Prove Seized Samples Were Not In Safe Custody, Burden Lies On Prosecution To Establish Safe Handling: J&K High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)





