Order Disposing Application U/S 91 CrPC Interlocutory, No Revision Lies Against It: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Live LawThe Madhya Pradesh High Court recently set aside the order of lower court allowing revision against rejection of application under Section 91 CrPC, reiterating that the impugned order was interlocutory in nature and therefore no revision lies against it. Justice Atul Shreedharan was dealing with an application under Section 482 CrPC, moved by the Applicant who was aggrieved by the order of the lower court allowing revision against rejection of an application under Section 91 CrPC, moved by his wife. Placing reliance on the decision of the Apex Court in Sethuraman v. Rajamanickam, the Applicant argued that the impugned order was bad in law since the power of revision was exercised to allow a petition against rejection of Application under Section 91 CrPC, which is inherently interlocutory in nature. Referring to the decision of the Apex Court in Sethuraman case, the Court noted that it is categorical regarding orders deciding applications under Sections 91 and 311 CrPC are interlocutory in nature.