Kerala High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Of Man Spotted And Identified By Minor Victim In Public Place 1.5 Months After Incident
Live LawThe Kerala High Court last week held that conviction for rape can be made on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix and no corroboration such as test identification parade would be required if the evidence of the victim was reliable and inspires the confidence of the Court. The Court held that in appropriate cases when the evidence of the victim is reliable and trustworthy, the Court may accept the evidence of identification, even without insisting on test identification parade. In appropriate cases, it may accept the evidence of identification, even without insisting on corroboration.” The Court then considered the ingredients of rape prior to the amendment of IPC vide Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013 as the alleged offence took place in 2004. Conviction can be recorded on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix, if her evidence inspires confidence and there is absence of circumstances which militate against her veracity.” After considering the entire evidence, the Court found that there was forceful sexual intercourse against the victim and that the prosecution has established the offence of rape punishable under Section 376 of IPC by the accused.