Assessee Is Not Responsible For Disclosing Individual Transactions In ST-3 Returns: CESTAT
1 month, 1 week ago

Assessee Is Not Responsible For Disclosing Individual Transactions In ST-3 Returns: CESTAT

Live Law  

The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has stated that ST-3 Return does not require transaction wise details. If the officer does not do so, and any tax escapes assessment, the responsibility for it rests on the officer.” The assessee/respondent provided taxable construction services and paid service tax accordingly. There is neither any responsibility on the assessee nor any scope to disclose individual transactions in the ST-3 returns.” The Tribunal stated that 'the central excise officer' has an obligation to make his best judgment if either the assessee fails to furnish the returns or, having filed the return, fails to assess tax in accordance with the Act and Rules. Counsel for Appellant/ Department: S. K. Meena Counsel for Respondent/ Assessee: Varun Gaba Case Title: Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax, Delhi South Commissionerate v. M/s Haamid Real Estate Pvt.

Tribunal Date Officer Stat Returns Assessee Service Tax Taxable Services Individual Transactions  transactions  date  service  disclosing  responsible  officer  individual  taxable  services  returns  responsibility  st3  tax  cestat  assessee

History of this topic

Finance Act, 2013 | Audit Report Determining Tax Liability Doesn't Bar Eligibility Under Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme: Delhi HC
3 weeks ago

Finance Act, 2013 | Audit Report Determining Tax Liability Doesn't Bar Eligibility Under Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme: Delhi HC

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has held that an audit report determining liability towards tax dues is not a notice or an order of determination as contemplated under Section 106 of the Finance Act, 2013. Sub-section states that any person may declare his tax dues in respect of which no notice or an order of determination under section 72 or section …

Assessing Officer Not Required To Examine Commercial Expediency Of Transaction When Evaluating Assessee's Explanation U/S 68 Of IT Act: Delhi HC
1 month ago

Assessing Officer Not Required To Examine Commercial Expediency Of Transaction When Evaluating Assessee's Explanation U/S 68 Of IT Act: Delhi HC

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that once an assessee offers explanation about nature and source of a credit transaction standing in its books, the burden of proof to show that such explanation is unsatisfactory shifts on the Assessing Officer.A division bench of Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Swarana Kanta Sharma further held that in evaluating the transaction so …

Receipts From CRM Services Not Taxable In India As Royalty Or FTS: ITAT
6 months, 3 weeks ago

Receipts From CRM Services Not Taxable In India As Royalty Or FTS: ITAT

Live Law  

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that receipts from Customer Relationship Management services are not taxable in India as royalty or Fee for Technical Services.The bench of Saktijit Dey and Brajesh Kumar Singh has observed that on November 26, 2019, the assessee filed a revised return of income, declaring income. The Delhi Bench of Income Tax …

Indirect Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 04 To 10 February 2024
10 months, 1 week ago

Indirect Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 04 To 10 February 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court Customs Act | Claimant Entitled To Interest On Delayed Return Of The 'Duty Drawback' : Supreme Court UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Madras High Court Case Title: M/s.Supreme Paradise Versus Assistant Commissioner Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 61 The Madras High Court has held that a discount linked to the subsidy alone can form part of the “transaction value.” Case …

Refund Cannot Be Denied To Any Person Who Has Borne The Incidence Of Tax: CESTAT
1 year, 7 months ago

Refund Cannot Be Denied To Any Person Who Has Borne The Incidence Of Tax: CESTAT

Live Law  

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that a refund cannot be denied to any person who has borne the incidence of tax.The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta and Hemambika R. Priya has observed that Rajasthan Housing Board has also deducted the service tax payable by them by reverse charge mechanism from. The …

Tax Cases Monthly Round Up: March 2023
1 year, 8 months ago

Tax Cases Monthly Round Up: March 2023

Live Law  

Indirect Taxes Supreme Court Case Title: State of Karnataka v. M/s. Case Title: M/s Lupin Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Tax & Customs, Guntur The Hyderabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has rejected the refund claim of Krishi Kalyan Cess worth rs. Delhi High Court Case Title: OYO Hotels and Homes Private Limited vs Deputy Assistant …

Tax Cases Monthly Round-Up: November, 2022
2 years ago

Tax Cases Monthly Round-Up: November, 2022

Live Law  

Indirect Taxes Supreme Court Case Title: OCL India Limited vs State of Orissa Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 911 The Supreme Court upheld States' power to impose entry tax from Industrial Township/Areas. Bombay High Court Case Title: Asit C. Mehta Financial Services Limited versus The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal The Bombay High Court has ruled that the time limit …

Registration Of Premises Not A Necessary Prerequisite For Claiming A Refund Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTAT
2 years, 2 months ago

Registration Of Premises Not A Necessary Prerequisite For Claiming A Refund Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: CESTAT

Live Law  

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that the registration of premises is a necessary prerequisite for claiming a refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.The bench of Rachna Gupta has observed that service providers are entitled to a refund under rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 when …

Retracted Statement Cannot Simply Be Brushed Aside : CESTAT
2 years, 4 months ago

Retracted Statement Cannot Simply Be Brushed Aside : CESTAT

Live Law  

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that the contents of the retracted statement cannot simply be brushed aside to conclude that the assessee/appellant has indulged in the activity of undervaluation of goods. The appellant submitted that there was no inordinate delay in filing the retraction statement inasmuch as copies of the statements …

Other Income Tax Additions In Reassessment Proceedings Cannot Be Sustained If Addition on Primary Grounds Is Not Made: ITAT
2 years, 6 months ago

Other Income Tax Additions In Reassessment Proceedings Cannot Be Sustained If Addition on Primary Grounds Is Not Made: ITAT

Live Law  

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal consisting of C.N. The assessee/appellant has challenged the validity of the assessment made by the Assessing Officer as the assessment was reopened for escapement of income on account of cash deposits made into the bank account by the assessee. The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer have reason to believe that …

Service Tax Cannot Be Levied On Reimbursement Of Expenses Incurred By The Service Provider: Reiterates CESTAT Delhi
2 years, 6 months ago

Service Tax Cannot Be Levied On Reimbursement Of Expenses Incurred By The Service Provider: Reiterates CESTAT Delhi

Live Law  

The Delhi Bench of CESTAT has reiterated that service tax cannot be levied on reimbursement of expenses incurred by the service provider. Subba Rao, held that since Rule 5 of the Service Tax Rules, 2006 has been held to be ultra vires by the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India versus Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. The …

Discover Related