Recovery Of Excess Pension Payments From Retired Class-III Employee Impermissible: Patna HC
Live LawPatna High Court: A Single Judge Bench consisting Justice Purnendu Singh allowed a writ petition that challenged the recovery of excess pension payments made to a retired Central Industrial Security Force Sub-Inspector. Following State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih, the court ruled that recovery of excess payments from Class-III employees is impermissible when the error is administrative and not due to employee misrepresentation. Citing State of Punjab v Rafiq Masih 4 SCC 334, he argued that recovery from retired Class-III employees is impermissible especially when such employees rely on their pensions for livelihood and committed no misrepresentation or fraud. : Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11407 of 2024| Pramod Kumar Sinha v. Union of India Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. Gajendra Pratap Singh Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Krishna Nandan Singh, Mrs. Punam Kumari Singh, and Mr. Amarjeet