SC refers to 7-judge bench issue of determining correctness of minority status to AMU
In a significant development, the Supreme Court Tuesday referred the controversy over minority status for Aligarh Muslim University to a 7-judge bench, which will also lay down parameters for granting the tag to an educational institution. A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi agreed with the submission of the AMU that the correctness of the 2006 judgement of the Allahabad High Court, by which the minority tag to the university was taken away, needs to be examined in detail. Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for AMU, submitted that the issue involved in the matter was important as the apex court in its 7-judge bench judgement in the TMA Pai case in 2002 did not deal with the aspect as to what should be the requirement for establishing a minority institution. Besides AMU, the then UPA government also filed an appeal against the 2006 verdict of the Allahabad High Court holding that the varsity was not a minority institution. It said a five-judge Constitution bench in 1968 in the Aziz Basha case had held that AMU was a "central university" and not a minority institution.












Discover Related

DC Edit | Religion-based quotas unacceptable

‘Commission can’t seek records on reservation from minority institutions’

Delhi HC seeks Centre, Jamia's response on plea challenging VC appointment

Even a Hindu can be a minority in India: Faizan Mustafa

Mehbooba Mufti seeks AP, Bihar CMs’ help for stopping Waqf amendments

Amritsar medical college, principal fined ₹1L for cancelling MBBS admission

Congress moves SC against pleas challenging 1991 places of worship law

Congress’s KC Venugopal moves Supreme Court to defend Places of Worship Act

Caste discrimination in university campuses

The Constitution on minority rights

Odisha Universities Bill stalls; delays vice-chancellor, faculty appointments

Civil Courts Can't Run A Race With Supreme Court, There Is A Judgment Upholding Places Of Worship Act : SC

Civil Courts Can't Run A Race With Supreme Court, There Is A Judgment Upholding Places Of Worship Act : SC

SC to hear pleas challenging provisions of Places of Worship Act 1991 today

CPM approaches Supreme Court, opposes pleas challenging Places of Worship Act

Demand raised for SC/ST reservation at AMU
