Arbitration Cases Annual Digest 2024
Live LawSupreme Court Supreme Court Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Validity Of Section 3G Of National Highways Act Case Title: B.D. High Court Not Having Original Civil Jurisdiction Cannot Extend Time To Pass Arbitral Award As Per S.29A Arbitration Act : Supreme Court Case Title: CHIEF ENGINEER PWD VERSUS M/S BSC & C and C JV Citation : 2024 LiveLaw 425 The Supreme Court held that a High Court which does not have original civil jurisdiction does not have the power to extend the time limit for passing of the arbitral award as per Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. The bench comprising of Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Kshitij Shailendra held “This Court seriously deprecates the approach of the Arbitrator/Collector who is vested with statutory powers to determine lawful compensation as per the scheme of the Act of 1956 and, therefore, once the Court superior to him analyzed each and every aspect of the initial award dated 30.09.2010 as well as the arbitral award dated 15.09.2017 and set aside the same after recording findings on merits of the petitioner's claim as regards market value of the land on the date of notifications acquiring the land, the Arbitrator/Collector was bound to follow the quasi- judicial discipline and record finding on each of the parameters discussed by the learned District Judge” Allegations On Arbitrator's Independence Under Item 24 Of 5th Schedule Of Arbitration Act Is Not Automatically A Ground For Disqualification: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Gepdec Infratech Limited Thru Authorized Representative vs U.P. Technical Difficulties Shouldn't Thwart Objectives Of Arbitral Proceeding: Bombay High Court Allows Petition For Replacement Of Arbitrator Case Title: M/s.Paresh Construction & Foundation Ltd. vs Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. Case Number: ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.18473 OF 2023 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.13 OF 2023 The Bombay High Court single bench of Justice Bharti Dangre held although there might be an impression that with the legal termination of the arbitral tribunal's mandateupon the expiration of one year from the reference entry, as per Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 there might be a technical difficulty. Jurisdiction of High Courts Under Section 37 Of Arbitration Act Is Limited To Arbitrary, Capricious And Perverse Orders: Bombay High Court Case Title: M/s Halliburton India Operations Private Limited vs Vision Projects Technologies Pvt.