N. Carolina justices won’t step aside in redistricting case
Associated PressRALEIGH, N.C. — Three North Carolina Supreme Court justices said Monday they won’t step aside from hearing a blockbuster redistricting case this week, rejecting requests from lawyers covering both sides of the litigation to recuse themselves. Earls, whose written explanation went nine pages, said “I have subjectively determined that I can and will be fair and impartial in carry out my duties in this case.” She said that three of the concerns that the lawyers for Republican lawyers brought up were raised in a previous recusal motion in a 2019 redistricting case and that was denied by the court. The latest recusal motion mentioned connections between Earls’ candidacy and a national Democratic redistricting group led by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who endorsed her in 2018. “The entities contributing to my 2018 campaign are not parties to this lawsuit,” she wrote, As for her professional association with Southern Coalition lawyer Allison Riggs, Earls wrote that it’s now been years since she’s worked with her, and thus the previous association “therefore is not disqualifying.” Ervin wrote that he failed to see how the court’s past or future rulings in the redistricting lawsuits would impact his ability to obtain reelection to the court in November.