UAPA is against principles of law & justice
Deccan ChronicleIndia has made a change to its anti-terrorism law, the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. In 2006, the United Nations Special Rapporteur had said that to call an offence a “terrorist act”, three elements must be cumulatively present: the means used must be deadly; the intent behind the act must be to cause fear among the population or to compel a government or international organisation to do or refrain from doing something; and the aim must be to further an ideological goal. It also includes any act that is “likely to threaten” or “likely to strike terror in people”, giving unbridled power to the government to brand any ordinary citizen or activist a terrorist without the actual commission of these acts. People in politics understand this and we should take note that a former Union home minister, who presumably knows as much about anti-terror laws as anyone else, has opposed the UAPA Amendment. The very idea of the UAPA and the decision to start naming people terrorists without convictions is going against the principles of law and justice.