Supreme Court Has Repeatedly Said 10 Years Experience In Law Is Sufficient For Appointment As Judicial Member In Tribunals : Bombay High Court
Live LawQuashing certain provisions of the new Consumer Protection Rules, 2020 the Bombay High Court has said 10 years of experience in law and in other specialized fields is sufficient for appointment as a judicial member in the Tribunal. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court's judgments in the series of Madras Bar Association cases which held that advocates with experience of 10 years should be considered for appointment as members of Tribunals. Consumer Protection Bar Association, the Supreme Court observed that both in relation to the State Commissions and the district fora, a member must be a person of ability and standing with adequate knowledge and experience of at least 10 years in dealing with problems relating to economics, law, commerce, accountancy, industry, public affairs or administration. Case Title: Vijaykumar Bhima Dighe v. Union of India and others and Dr.Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye v.Union of India and others Also Read: Bombay High Court Quashes Consumer Protection Rules Excluding Lawyers With 10-20 Years Experience From Appointments To Consumer Commissions