IBC Proceedings Maintainable Even If Company's Name Struck Off From The Register Of Companies: NCLAT
5 years, 3 months ago

IBC Proceedings Maintainable Even If Company's Name Struck Off From The Register Of Companies: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT has reiterated that an application under Sections 7 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for the initiation of 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' is maintainable even if the name of the Company has been struck-off by the Registrar of Companies. Elektrans submitted that the admission of insolvency proceedings was erroneous as, the Company's name was struck off by the Registrar of Companies from the ROC. On reading of section 248 of the Act, NCLAT observed that before passing an order for removing the name from the ROC, the Registrar must satisfy himself that sufficient provision has been made for realisation of all amount due to the company and for the payment or discharge of its liabilities and obligations, within a reasonable time. The Appellate Bench opined that as per section 252 of the Act, an application against the Registrar's decision to remove the name, can be made to the NCLT to restore the position of the Company and its management, before its name was removed. The Bench also noted that sub-clause 7 of section 248 of the Act clearly provides that, the existing liability of every the ex-management of a Company will continue, even after the removal of the Company's name from the ROC.

Registrar Company Act Bench Nclat Roc Section 248  struck  companys  nclat  register  proceedings  companies  company  application  insolvency  bench  act  maintainable  registrar  position  ibc

History of this topic

After Initiation Of Moratorium U/S 14 Of IBC, No Assessment Proceedings Can Be Continued By EPFO: NCLAT
5 days ago

After Initiation Of Moratorium U/S 14 Of IBC, No Assessment Proceedings Can Be Continued By EPFO: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi Bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra and Mr. Arun Baroka has held that after initiation of moratorium under Section 14, sub-section, no assessment proceedings can be continued by the EPFO. On the other hand it is the case of the respondent that no claim was filed by the Appellant before the Plan was approved …

Annual Digest Of IBC Cases: 2024
1 week ago

Annual Digest Of IBC Cases: 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court Case Title: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association vs. M/S. : Company Appeal No.231 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra, has held that the Corporate Debtor cannot be absolved from its liability to discharge its Operational debt by the Insurance Company's payment to the Operational Creditor …

IBC Monthly Digest: December 2024
1 week, 1 day ago

IBC Monthly Digest: December 2024

Live Law  

SUPREME COURT Case Title : China Development Bank vs Doha Bank OPSC and others Citation : 2024 LiveLaw 1029 The Supreme Court has observed a default is not necessary for a debt to become a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Case Number: Company Appeal No.1380 of 2024 The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, …

IBC Weekly Round Up [23rd December-29th December 2024]
1 week, 2 days ago

IBC Weekly Round Up [23rd December-29th December 2024]

Live Law  

NOMINAL INDEX China Development Bank vs Doha Bank OPSC and others, 2024 LiveLaw 1029 Ram Kishor Arora, Suspended Director of Supertech Ltd. vs. Union Bank of India & Anr., Company Appeal No. 748 of 2023 Vidyadhar Sarfare & Anr Versus CS Anagha Anasingharaju & Ors., Company Appeal No.1733 of 2024 M/S ALLIED HI-TECH INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED VS. KARVY DATA MANAGEMENT …

Application U/S 12A Of IBC Can Be Withdrawn By Resolution Professional Before It Is Heard Or Allowed: NCLAT
2 weeks, 1 day ago

Application U/S 12A Of IBC Can Be Withdrawn By Resolution Professional Before It Is Heard Or Allowed: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra and Arun Baroka has held that CIRP withdrawal application can be withdrawn by Resolution Professional before the application is heard and allowed. Thereafter, the MHIL was informed by the RP about the decision taken by the CoC regarding CIRP withdrawal and that an application under section 12A had also …

IBC Weekly Round-Up: 16th December -20th December 2024
2 weeks, 1 day ago

IBC Weekly Round-Up: 16th December -20th December 2024

Live Law  

NCLAT The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra and Arun Baroka has held that Non Fund Based facilities cannot be refused to be disbursed when the approved Resolution Plan contains a clause for their disbursement. 7303, 7304 of 2024 The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra and Mr. Arun Baroka has …

IBC Weekly Round Up [2nd December To 8th December, 2024]
4 weeks, 2 days ago

IBC Weekly Round Up [2nd December To 8th December, 2024]

Live Law  

Nominal Index: Harsh Mehta Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India and Ors., WRIT PETITION NO. 737, 783 of 2024 Mr. Gajjala Yoganand versus Mr. Birendra Kumar Agarwal and Ors., IA No.373 of 2024 in CP No.296/7/HDB/2022 M/s Avani Towers Private Limited vs. M/s Energy Properties Private Limited, IA No. Related Party Can't Be Allowed Backdoor Entry Into CoC On …

Fraudulent Initiation Of CIRP Can Be Set Aside By NCLAT While Hearing Appeal U/S 61: NCLAT New Delhi
1 month, 1 week ago

Fraudulent Initiation Of CIRP Can Be Set Aside By NCLAT While Hearing Appeal U/S 61: NCLAT New Delhi

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain,Mr. Naresh Salecha and Mr. Indevar Pandey has held that fraudulent initiation of the CIRP can be set aside by the NCLT or as a corollary by NCLAT also as they have jurisdiction to decide whether any proceeding under the code has been initiated fraudulently or not. 3 who happened to …

Once Plausibility Of Pre-Existing Dispute Is Established, Application U/S 9 Of IBC Must Be Rejected: NCLAT
1 month, 1 week ago

Once Plausibility Of Pre-Existing Dispute Is Established, Application U/S 9 Of IBC Must Be Rejected: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain, Barun Mitra and Indevar Pandey has held that IBC bestows only summary jurisdiction upon the Adjudicating Authority. It was further submitted that there is no genuine foundation of pre-existing dispute since all the pump sets were supplied after third party inspection which agency had certified the goods at the time …

IBC Weekly Round-Up [18th November To 24th November 2024]
1 month, 2 weeks ago

IBC Weekly Round-Up [18th November To 24th November 2024]

Live Law  

Nominal Index Siti Networks Ltd. vs. Rajiv Suri NO. Versus Shri Sutanu Sinha Case Reference: Company Appeal No.1927 of 2024 The NLCAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Barun Mitra held that no interest on principal amount can be claimed if there is no clause to this effect in the agreement executed between the parties. The Tribunal further …

Property In Possession Of Corporate Debtor Sold When Petition U/S 7 Of IBC Was In Consideration Cannot Be Excluded From Assets: NCLAT
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Property In Possession Of Corporate Debtor Sold When Petition U/S 7 Of IBC Was In Consideration Cannot Be Excluded From Assets: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT Chennai bench of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma and Jatindranath Swain has held that property that is sold which was in possession of the corporate debtor immediately before the judgment in a petition under section 7 of the IBC was reserved cannot be excluded from the purview of the assets of the corporate debtor. An IA was filed by …

Since Shareholders Of Corporate Debtor Do Not Fall Within Definition Of “Aggrieved Party”, Appeal Filed U/S 61 Of IBC Not Maintainable: NCLAT
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Since Shareholders Of Corporate Debtor Do Not Fall Within Definition Of “Aggrieved Party”, Appeal Filed U/S 61 Of IBC Not Maintainable: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain,Mr. Naresh Salecha and Mr. Indevar Pandey affirmed that a shareholder of the company is not the “aggrieved party” as per the provisions of the Code therefore appeal filed by him under section 61 of the Code would not be maintainable. In the aforesaid Company matter, the Respondent no.1 submitted copy …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 22nd July 2024 To 28th July 2024
5 months, 1 week ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 22nd July 2024 To 28th July 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC | CIRP Of Holding Company Cannot Include Subsidiary's Assets: Supreme Court Case no. Insolvency Resolution Of Corporate Guarantor Won't Bar Creditor From Filing CIRP Against Corporate Debtor For Balance Debt : Supreme Court Case Title: BRS Ventures Investments Ltd. 313 of 2024 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr Barun …

Directing Corporate Debtor To Civil Courts Or Arbitration For Admitted Dues Undermines IBC Objectives: NCLT Mumbai
5 months, 1 week ago

Directing Corporate Debtor To Civil Courts Or Arbitration For Admitted Dues Undermines IBC Objectives: NCLT Mumbai

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai bench of Kuldip Kumar Kareer and Anil Raj Chellan had held that directing Corporate Debtor to seek resolution through civil courts or arbitration for even admitted dues would undermine the objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was initiated against the Corporate Debtor by the National Company Law Tribunal, …

Half Yearly Digest Of IBC Cases : January To June,2024
5 months, 3 weeks ago

Half Yearly Digest Of IBC Cases : January To June,2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC | Moratorium Under S 14 No Bar To Execute Decree Against Directors/Officers Of Corporate Debtor: Supreme Court Case Title: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association vs. M/S. : Company Appeal No.231 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra, has held that the Corporate Debtor cannot be …

NCLT Asks IBBI To Incorporate Provisions In CIRP Regulations For Treating Transferred Winding-Up Cases
6 months, 2 weeks ago

NCLT Asks IBBI To Incorporate Provisions In CIRP Regulations For Treating Transferred Winding-Up Cases

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Principle Bench of Ramalingam Sudhakar and Avinash K. Srivastava has asked the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India to amend the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process regulations. This directive was issued by NCLT to address the handling of cases involving the winding up of companies that have been transferred to the NCLT under Section 433 of …

NCLAT Delhi: Section 95(1) Of IBC Permits Creditors To Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantors Via A Resolution Professional
6 months, 2 weeks ago

NCLAT Delhi: Section 95(1) Of IBC Permits Creditors To Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantors Via A Resolution Professional

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Delhi bench, comprising Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Arun Baroka held that Section 95 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy, Code, 2016 allows creditors to initiate insolvency process against a Personal Guarantor through a Resolution Professional. Contention of the Appellant: The Appellant argued that since the default occurred on 04.03.2016, the Section 95 application filed …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 03rd June 2024 To 09th June 2024
6 months, 4 weeks ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 03rd June 2024 To 09th June 2024

Live Law  

HIGH COURTS Official Liquidator Must Adhere To Ethical Principles And Fairness To Discharge Their Duties Under IBC: Delhi High Court Case Title: Sundaresh Bhat vs Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board of India Case No. 105, 106, 990 of 2024 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Delhi, comprising Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain, Mr. Naresh Salecha, and Mr. Indevar Pandey held that …

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: May 2024
7 months ago

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: May 2024

Live Law  

SUPREME COURT Can Homebuyer's Claim For Apartment Be Rejected For Not Filing Claim During Insolvency Process Against Builder? 1398 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra, and Mr. Arun Baroka held that documentary evidence including postal receipt mentioning the registered address of the Corporate Debtor confirms the issuance of a Demand …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 13th To 19th May 2024
7 months, 2 weeks ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 13th To 19th May 2024

Live Law  

NCLAT NCLAT Delhi Evokes Doctrine Of 'Approbate & Reprobate', Imposes Rs. 124 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Delhi, comprising Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain, Mr. Naresh Salecha, and Mr. Indevar Pandey evokes the Doctrine of 'Approbrate and Reprobrate' imposing a cost of Rs. 1589 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. …

Ambiguities In Uploading Of NCLT Orders, Requirement Of Enclosing Certified Copies With Appeal : Supreme Court Seeks IBBI Clarification
7 months, 4 weeks ago

Ambiguities In Uploading Of NCLT Orders, Requirement Of Enclosing Certified Copies With Appeal : Supreme Court Seeks IBBI Clarification

Live Law  

The Supreme Court issued notice to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, inter-alia, on the requirement to obtain a certified copy of the order and attach the same with the appeal. The Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta has issued notice considering that there is “considerable ambiguity” in certain issues concerning the service of the orders passed …

IBC Cases Quarterly Digest : January To March 2024
9 months ago

IBC Cases Quarterly Digest : January To March 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court Case Title: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association V M/S. : Company Appeal No.231 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra, has held that the Corporate Debtor cannot be absolved from its liability to discharge its Operational debt by the Insurance Company's payment to the Operational Creditor …

IBC Revolutionizes Corporate Insolvency
9 months ago

IBC Revolutionizes Corporate Insolvency

Deccan Chronicle  

Exactly, 10 years ago, in the run-up to the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, Narendra Modi, who was the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, had said that traders have more risk-taking capacity than soldiers. Several hundreds of companies and lakhs of employees have benefitted from a relatively easy resolution process devised by IBC.After seven years of IBC’s journey, corporate litigation and disputes …

NCLT Kolkata: Any Attachment Of Tainted Assets Of Corporate Debtor Before CIRP Commencement Would Always Be Available To Fulfill The Object Of IBC
9 months, 1 week ago

NCLT Kolkata: Any Attachment Of Tainted Assets Of Corporate Debtor Before CIRP Commencement Would Always Be Available To Fulfill The Object Of IBC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata, comprising Smt. Bidisha Banerjee, and Shri D. Arvind held that Any attachment of tainted assets of a Corporate Debtor before the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commencement would always be available to fulfill the object and goal of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. NCLT Verdict: The NCLT Kolkata allowed the CIRP application and held …

NCLT Kolkata: Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA Won't Bar Admission Of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC
9 months, 1 week ago

NCLT Kolkata: Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA Won't Bar Admission Of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata, comprising Smt. Bidisha Banerjee, and Shri D. Arvind held that the Provisional Attachment Order under PMLA will not bar the admission of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process proceedings against the Corporate Debtor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. NCLT Verdict: The NCLT Kolkata allowed the CIRP application and held that the Provisional Attachment Order …

Section 7 IBC Petition Can't Be Filed By Power Of Attorney Holder Unless Authorized By Board Resolution: NCLT Hyderabad
9 months, 2 weeks ago

Section 7 IBC Petition Can't Be Filed By Power Of Attorney Holder Unless Authorized By Board Resolution: NCLT Hyderabad

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Court-1, Hyderabad bench comprising Dr Venkata Ramakrishna Badarinath Nandula and Shri Charan Singh held that a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be filed by a 'power of attorney' holder unless duly authorized by a Board Resolution. Additionally, the Corporate Debtor referred to a notification issued by the Central Government …

NCLT Kolkata: IBC Prevails Over State Financial Corporation Act, 1951
9 months, 3 weeks ago

NCLT Kolkata: IBC Prevails Over State Financial Corporation Act, 1951

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata, comprising Justice Ms. Bidisha Banerjee and Shri Arvind Devanathan held that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. Mr. Rajesh Lahila was appointed as the Resolution Professional on 17.02.2022 to manage the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor and to take custody of all the assets of the Corporate …

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: February 2024
10 months ago

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: February 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court Case Title: Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority Versus Prabhjit Singh Soni & Anr. : Company Appeal No.82 of 2024 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra, and Mr. Arun Baroka held that the Adjudicating Authority ought to have granted an exclusion/extension of time when the Resolution Plan received in the …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 5th To 11th February 2024
10 months, 3 weeks ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 5th To 11th February 2024

Live Law  

NCLAT NCLAT Delhi: Adjudicating Authority Should Grant Extension Of Time To Consider Resolution Plan Crucial To Fulfill Object Of IBC Case Title: Nimai Gautam Shah, Resolution Professional of Sintex Plastics Technology Ltd. vs. RBL Bank Ltd. Case No. : Company Appeal No.82 of 2024 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mitra, and …

NCLT Mumbai Allows Withdrawal Of Liquidation Application On Receipt Of Resolution Plan
10 months, 4 weeks ago

NCLT Mumbai Allows Withdrawal Of Liquidation Application On Receipt Of Resolution Plan

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal Mumbai, comprising Justice Shri. Anil Raj Chellan allowed the withdrawal of the liquidation application since one resolution plan was received by the Committee of Creditors during the pendency of the liquidation application upholding the aim of Insolvency and Bankruptcy, 2016. During the pendency of the liquidation application before NCLT, the Interim Resolution Professional received an …

Appeal Under Section 42 Of IBC Would Only Lie Against An 'Adjudicating' Order Of The Liquidator: NCLT Mumbai
11 months ago

Appeal Under Section 42 Of IBC Would Only Lie Against An 'Adjudicating' Order Of The Liquidator: NCLT Mumbai

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, comprising of Smt. The Bench has rejected an appeal filed under Section 42 of IBC, whereby Employees Provident Fund Organization challenged a letter sent by the Liquidator at a time when he stood discharged from his duties due to dissolution of the Corporate Debtor. The Employees Provident Fund Organization passed orders under Section …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 29th January To 4th February 2024
11 months ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 29th January To 4th February 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court Case Title: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association V M/S. : Company Appeal No.1650 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Shri Barun Mitra and Shri Arun Baroka, has held that a resolution applicant who has participated in the process, has locus to object the application filed by Resolution Professional …

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: January 2024
11 months ago

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: January 2024

Live Law  

Supreme Court Case Title: Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association V M/S. : Company Appeal No.231 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra, has held that the Corporate Debtor cannot be absolved from its liability to discharge its Operational debt by the Insurance Company's payment to the Operational Creditor …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 22nd To 28th January 2024
11 months, 1 week ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 22nd To 28th January 2024

Live Law  

NCLAT Case title: Parikshit Madanmohan Sharma v M.S. 206 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, comprising of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain and Shri Naresh Salecha, has held that when the total number of allottees in a real estate project is disputed, then the NCLT should first decide whether the Section 7 petition has been filed …

IBC | Settlement In Section 7 Or Dropping Of Sec. 66 Proceedings Does Not Automatically End Proceedings Under Section 43: NCLT Mumbai
11 months, 2 weeks ago

IBC | Settlement In Section 7 Or Dropping Of Sec. 66 Proceedings Does Not Automatically End Proceedings Under Section 43: NCLT Mumbai

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, comprising of Shri Kuldip Kumar Kareer and Shri Anil Raj Chellan, has held that the proceedings under Section 43 of IBC would not automatically end against a party, if the parties enter settlement in Section 7 of IBC proceedings or proceedings under Section 66 of IBC are dropped. The Applicant was deleted from …

IBC | Statutory Set Off Or Insolvency Set Off Inapplicable To Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: Supreme Court
1 year ago

IBC | Statutory Set Off Or Insolvency Set Off Inapplicable To Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has held statutory set off or insolvency set off is not applicable to Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. “We would not extend it by implication, when the legislature has not accepted applicability of mutual set-off at the initial stage, that is, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process stage.” BACKGROUND FACTS In …

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: December 2023
1 year ago

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: December 2023

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC | When Matter Heard But No Order Pronounced On The Same Day, Limitation To Commence From The Date When Order Gets Uploaded: Supreme Court Case Title: Sanjay Pandurang Kalate v Vistra ITCL Limited and Others Case No. “Such proactive action by tribunals is essential to ensure that the move towards a modernized and technology-friendly judiciary trickles down …

NCLAT Delhi: Decisions To Liquidate Corporate Debtor By CoC U/S 33(2) Of IBC Must Be With Reasons And Cannot Be Done Arbitrarily
1 year ago

NCLAT Delhi: Decisions To Liquidate Corporate Debtor By CoC U/S 33(2) Of IBC Must Be With Reasons And Cannot Be Done Arbitrarily

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra held that decisions of the Committee of Creditors to liquidate under Section 33 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 have to be with reasons and the liquidation cannot be decided arbitrarily. Background Facts: On 10.08.2023, the Adjudicating Authority admitted the application of …

Yearly Digest Of IBC Cases: 2023
1 year ago

Yearly Digest Of IBC Cases: 2023

Live Law  

Supreme Court “Inappropriate, Almost Bordering On Contempt”: SC Deprecates NCLAT Order Impeding Implementation Of SC Order Case Title: Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v Iirf India Realty Xii Ltd. & Ors. 1125 of 2022 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Shri Barun Mitra, has directed the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, M/s Ajanta …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 11th To 17th December 2023
1 year ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 11th To 17th December 2023

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC | When Matter Heard But No Order Pronounced On The Same Day, Limitation To Commence From The Date When Order Gets Uploaded: Supreme Court Case Title: Sanjay Pandurang Kalate v Vistra ITCL Limited and Others Case No. : Civil Appeal Nos 7467-7468 of 2023 The Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice of India Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, …

NCLT Hyderabad: Airport Authority Of India Being A Statutory Body Does Not Fall Within Scope Of 'Corporate Person' U/S 3(7) Of IBC
1 year, 1 month ago

NCLT Hyderabad: Airport Authority Of India Being A Statutory Body Does Not Fall Within Scope Of 'Corporate Person' U/S 3(7) Of IBC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, comprising of Smt. Bidisha Banerjee and Shri Arvind Devanathan has held that no proceedings can be initiated against the Airport Authority of India as it is a statutory body created under the Airport Authority of India Act, 1944, does not fall under the definition of 'corporate person' under Section 3 of Insolvency and …

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: November 2023
1 year, 1 month ago

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: November 2023

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC Resolution Plan Can't Ignore Government Dues: Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against 'Rainbow Papers' Case title: Sanjay Agarwal v. State Tax Officer Citation: 2023 LiveLaw 939 The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of review petitions filed against a 2022 judgment which held that the definition of a secured creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 …

NCLT Delhi: Application U/s 7 IBC Cannot Be Initiated Against A Struck-off Company; NCLT cant Suo Motu Restore The Name
1 year, 1 month ago

NCLT Delhi: Application U/s 7 IBC Cannot Be Initiated Against A Struck-off Company; NCLT cant Suo Motu Restore The Name

Live Law  

The National Company Law Tribunal, Delhi Bench, comprising of Manni Sankariah Shanmuga Sundaram and Dr Binod Kumar Sinha has held that any application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be initiated against a company struck off by Registrar of Company and the power to restore the name of such a company under section 252 of …

SC Upholds Validity of Key Provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
1 year, 2 months ago

SC Upholds Validity of Key Provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

News 18  

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld certain key provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code amid the claim of several petitioners that that they are violative of fundamental rights like the right to equality of those against whom insolvency proceedings are initiated. A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra decided as …

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 30th October To 5th November 2023
1 year, 2 months ago

Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 30th October To 5th November 2023

Live Law  

Supreme Court IBC Resolution Plan Can't Ignore Government Dues: Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against 'Rainbow Papers' Case title: Sanjay Agarwal v. State Tax Officer Citation: 2023 LiveLaw 939 The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of review petitions filed against a 2022 judgment which held that the definition of a secured creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 …

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: October 2023
1 year, 2 months ago

Monthly Digest Of IBC Cases: October 2023

Live Law  

Supreme Court The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Aravind Kumar, has held that homebuyers cannot be treated differently from other "financial creditors" under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 just because they have secured orders from the authority under the Real Estate Act 2016. 799 of 2023 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New …

NCLAT New Delhi: Jurisdiction Of NCLT Under IBC Is Summary In Nature, Not Extensive As A Civil Court To Enquire Into Disputes
1 year, 2 months ago

NCLAT New Delhi: Jurisdiction Of NCLT Under IBC Is Summary In Nature, Not Extensive As A Civil Court To Enquire Into Disputes

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi comprising of Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra dismissed an appeal filed by Vistra ITCL Ltd.. It held that the scope and jurisdiction of National Company Law Tribunal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 being summary in nature is distinctly not as extensive as that of a …

NCLAT New Delhi: No Point In Discussing An Issue, Even If Issue Is Attractive, After The Closure Of CIRP Proceedings
1 year, 2 months ago

NCLAT New Delhi: No Point In Discussing An Issue, Even If Issue Is Attractive, After The Closure Of CIRP Proceedings

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi comprising of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain and Naresh Salecha, dismissed the appeal filed in State Bank of India vs. Ritesh Prakash Adatiya & Ors. The appeal was filed against the order dated 29.03.2023 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata whereby an application by the IRP of McLeod Russel …

Mere Statement Of Operational Creditor That No Dispute Exists, Is Not Enough : NCLAT Delhi
1 year, 2 months ago

Mere Statement Of Operational Creditor That No Dispute Exists, Is Not Enough : NCLAT Delhi

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Shri Barun Mitra, while adjudicating an appeal filed in NTT Data Business Solutions Pvt. When disputes arose between the Parties, the Corporate Debtor issued a notice invoking arbitration dated 14.06.2021 to the Operational Creditor, under Section 21 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Subsequently, the …

NCLAT Chennai: FC And OC Can’t Give Additional Facts Not Provided In Application Under Sections 7, 9 Or 10 Of IBC
1 year, 2 months ago

NCLAT Chennai: FC And OC Can’t Give Additional Facts Not Provided In Application Under Sections 7, 9 Or 10 Of IBC

Live Law  

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench comprising of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain and Shreesha Merla, dismissed the appeal filed in State Bank of India vs. India Power Corporation Ltd. The Appellate Tribunal held that a Petitioner cannot set up a new case/additional factual altogether that has not been set up in the main application filed either u/s 7, …

Discover Related