Petitions U/S 482 CrPC Filed With Delay Or To Overcome Expired Limitation Of Alternate Remedy Cannot Be Entertained: Delhi High Court
8 months, 1 week ago

Petitions U/S 482 CrPC Filed With Delay Or To Overcome Expired Limitation Of Alternate Remedy Cannot Be Entertained: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has observed that failure to avail alternate remedy on the ground of ongoing settlement process is not a reason for the court to exercise its discretionary power to quash the complaint cases. where it is filed with unexplained delay and laches and in the meantime, the trial has proceeded.” It referred to the Supreme Court case of Prabhu Chawla v. State of Rajasthan & Anr, 2016, where it was held that the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 Cr.PC must be done only under compelling circumstances and must not subvert other provisions within the Criminal Procedure Code, such as revision under Section 397. The court stated that even though there is no limitation period to file a petition under Section 482 Cr.PC, the petition may be dismissed if filed with delays and laches. “…though there is no period of limitation prescribed for a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the same, if filed with delay and laches, may not be entertained by the High Court where the petitioner does not offer any reasonable justification for such inordinate delay in filing of the petition.” It observed that the petitioners only filed the present petition when the proceedings before the trial court reached the stage of recording of the Complainant's evidence. “The petitions are, therefore, liable to be dismissed not only on account of inordinate delay and laches, but also on account of the petitioners not availing of their alternate efficacious remedy in the form of Revision Petition, but instead filing these petitions much beyond the period of limitation and with delay that would have haunted them had they filed the Revision Petitions.” Case title: Sanyam Bhushan vs. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Court Petitions Limitation Delay Filed Petitioners Crpc Section 482 482 Revision Petition Section 482 Cr  entertained  remedy  delay  trial  482  limitation  high  filed  delhi  revision  petition  petitions  overcome  court  petitioners  crpc  expired

History of this topic

S.245 CrPC | Mandatory For Magistrate To Record Reasons While Allowing/Rejecting Discharge Petition Of Accused: Orissa High Court
Trending News
1 week, 4 days ago

S.245 CrPC | Mandatory For Magistrate To Record Reasons While Allowing/Rejecting Discharge Petition Of Accused: Orissa High Court

Live Law  

The Orissa High Court has held that it is mandatory for the Magistrate to record reasons for not only allowing but also for rejecting a discharge petition filed by an accused under Section 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. As allowed, the petitioner filed discharge petition again before the trial Court raising all the grounds taken by him before …

Delhi HC junks plea against 30-year-old order acquitting 16 in 1984 riots case
3 weeks, 2 days ago

Delhi HC junks plea against 30-year-old order acquitting 16 in 1984 riots case

Hindustan Times  

The Delhi high court has refused to accept an appeal put forward by the Delhi Police against a 30-year-old city court’s order to acquit 16 people in connection with a case stemming from the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. While this court is conscious of the large-scale quantum of human lives and property during the 1984 riots, after having seen the quantum …

S. 379 BNSS | Court Not Bound To Hold Preliminary Inquiry Before Making Or Refusing To Make Complaint: Orissa High Court
3 weeks, 4 days ago

S. 379 BNSS | Court Not Bound To Hold Preliminary Inquiry Before Making Or Refusing To Make Complaint: Orissa High Court

Live Law  

The Orissa High Court has held that it is not mandatory on the part of Court to hold a preliminary inquiry as provided under Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita into commission of offences referred to in Section 215, BNSS in order to make or reject to make complaint. In order to decide maintainability of the petition, the …

S.107 CGST Act Prescribes Independent Regime Of Limitation For Filing Appeals, Application Of S.5 Limitation Act Stands Excluded: Delhi HC
1 month, 2 weeks ago

S.107 CGST Act Prescribes Independent Regime Of Limitation For Filing Appeals, Application Of S.5 Limitation Act Stands Excluded: Delhi HC

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has held that since Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 prescribes an “independent regime” to determine the limitation period for filing statutory appeals, the provision for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act stands excluded. Once it is found that the legislation incorporates a provision which creates a …

Delay Beyond 15 Days In Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned As Per Proviso To Section 61(2) Of IBC: NCLAT
2 months ago

Delay Beyond 15 Days In Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned As Per Proviso To Section 61(2) Of IBC: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Mr. Barun Mita and Mr. Arun Baroka has held that delay in filing an appeal beyond 15 days as per section 61 proviso of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be condoned. The appellant submitted that the appeal has been filed within a period of limitation that is within 45 days …

Briefing Standing Counsel, Obtaining Approvals From Officials Not 'Sufficient Cause' For Condoning Delay In Filing Appeal: Delhi High Court
2 months ago

Briefing Standing Counsel, Obtaining Approvals From Officials Not 'Sufficient Cause' For Condoning Delay In Filing Appeal: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

While rejecting an appeal moved by Delhi Government's Directorate of Education, the Delhi High Court has ruled that obtaining approvals from officials of its departments and briefing the standing counsel are not “sufficient cause” for application of condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. “In any event, in our considered view the aforesaid plea taken by the …

S.42 PLMA Excludes Applicability Of Section 5 Limitation Act, Delay In Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned Beyond 120 Days: Bombay High Court
2 months, 1 week ago

S.42 PLMA Excludes Applicability Of Section 5 Limitation Act, Delay In Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned Beyond 120 Days: Bombay High Court

Live Law  

The Bombay High Court has held that a delay in filing an appeal under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 cannot be condoned by the High Court beyond 120 days as stipulated in the provision. A division bench of Justice B. P. Colabawalla and Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan stated that Section 42 PMLA excludes the applicability of …

166 Days Delay In Re-Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned In Absence Of Genuine And Plausible Explanation: NCLAT
2 months, 1 week ago

166 Days Delay In Re-Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned In Absence Of Genuine And Plausible Explanation: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Barun Mitra has held that a delay of 166 in re-filing an appeal cannot be condoned in the absence of a plausible and genuine explanation offered for the same. No.6903 of 2024 is an application praying for condonation of 166 days delay in refiling an appeal. When the Appeal …

'Right To Access Justice Not Absolute' : Supreme Court Imposes Rs 1 Lakh Cost On Litigant For Multiple Frivolous Cases
2 months, 2 weeks ago

'Right To Access Justice Not Absolute' : Supreme Court Imposes Rs 1 Lakh Cost On Litigant For Multiple Frivolous Cases

Live Law  

The Supreme Court recently imposed a heavy cost of Rs.1,00,000 on the petitioner, who over the span of more than 11 years filed frivolous litigants and indulged in forum shopping more than 10 times including before the High Court of Bombay and the Supreme Court. The petitioner then filed an application to the Ministry of Law & Justice seeking inquiry …

Period From 15.03.2020 To 28.02.2022 Shall Stand Excluded As Per SC Judgment In 'Re:Cognizance For Extension Of Limitation': NCLAT
2 months, 2 weeks ago

Period From 15.03.2020 To 28.02.2022 Shall Stand Excluded As Per SC Judgment In 'Re:Cognizance For Extension Of Limitation': NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Yogesh Khanna and Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra has held that period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 shall stand excluded in light of the Supreme Court judgment in In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation for the purpose of calculating the limitation period while filing an application under section 9 of the code. However, after …

Successive Petitions U/S 482 CrPC Not Entertainable If Filed Without Any Change Of Facts Or Circumstances: Rajasthan High Court Reiterates
2 months, 2 weeks ago

Successive Petitions U/S 482 CrPC Not Entertainable If Filed Without Any Change Of Facts Or Circumstances: Rajasthan High Court Reiterates

Live Law  

Rajasthan High Court reiterated that there was no blanket rule against filing successive petitions under Section 482, CrPC, before the High Court, however, in such petitions it had to be seen whether there was any change in facts and circumstances that necessitated filing of the petition. The bench of Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand was hearing a criminal miscellaneous petition against …

NCLAT Directs Revival Of Company Petition After Appellant Was Deprived Of Remedies Under Article 21 Of Constitution
2 months, 3 weeks ago

NCLAT Directs Revival Of Company Petition After Appellant Was Deprived Of Remedies Under Article 21 Of Constitution

Live Law  

The NCLAT Chennai bench of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma and Jatindranath Swain, considering the peculiar situation where the civil suit was dismissed as withdrawn three days after the company petition under section 59 of the Companies Act was dismissed, directed the revival of company petition. The appellant also filed another civil suit in Civil Court Senior Division, Pune in RCS …

Dismissal Of Earlier S.482 CrPC Petition Doesn't Bar Subsequent Petition Filed Due To Change In Law : Supreme Court
2 months, 3 weeks ago

Dismissal Of Earlier S.482 CrPC Petition Doesn't Bar Subsequent Petition Filed Due To Change In Law : Supreme Court

Live Law  

Observing that the principle of res judicata is not strictly applicable to the criminal proceedings, the Supreme Court recently ruled that the dismissal of a previous petition does not preclude the filing of a subsequent petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C if it is prompted by a change in the law. The bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice …

Dismissal Of Earlier S.482 CrPC Petition Doesn't Bar Subsequent Petition Filed Due To Change In Law : Supreme Court
Trending News
2 months, 3 weeks ago

Dismissal Of Earlier S.482 CrPC Petition Doesn't Bar Subsequent Petition Filed Due To Change In Law : Supreme Court

Live Law  

Observing that the principle of res judicata is not strictly applicable to the criminal proceedings, the Supreme Court recently ruled that the dismissal of a previous petition does not preclude the filing of a subsequent petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C if it is prompted by a change in the law. The bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice …

Delay In Filing Certified Copy Of Impugned Order Doesn't Render Appeal Filed Electronically U/S 107 CGST Act Time-Barred: Delhi HC
2 months, 3 weeks ago

Delay In Filing Certified Copy Of Impugned Order Doesn't Render Appeal Filed Electronically U/S 107 CGST Act Time-Barred: Delhi HC

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has held that delay in filing certified copy of impugned order in an appeal preferred by Assessee under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 would not render the appeal time-barred, if it was filed online within prescribed time. Thereafter, under Rule 108 of CGST Rules, certified copy of the decision could …

Order 23 Rule 2 CPC| Limitation For Suit Instituted Afresh Applies As If Earlier Suit Was Never Filed: Jharkhand High Court
3 months, 1 week ago

Order 23 Rule 2 CPC| Limitation For Suit Instituted Afresh Applies As If Earlier Suit Was Never Filed: Jharkhand High Court

Live Law  

The Jharkhand High Court has under Order 23 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, the limitation period for a fresh suit instituted with court permission applies as if the original suit had never been filed. Order 23 CPC pertains to withdrawal and adjustment of suits wherein Rule 2 states that in any fresh suit instituted on permission granted under …

'Judicial Time & Resources Abused': Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs.5 Lakh Cost On Litigant For Supressing Facts, Filing Repeated Pleas
3 months, 1 week ago

'Judicial Time & Resources Abused': Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs.5 Lakh Cost On Litigant For Supressing Facts, Filing Repeated Pleas

Live Law  

The Punjab & Haryana High Court imposed a cost of Rs.5 lakh on litigant who repeatedly abused the process of court by filing successive pleas and suppressed “crucial fact.” The plea was filed challenging the resumption order of a land which was allotted to the petitioner subject to certain conditions. A bench of Justice Arun Palli and Justice Vikram Aggarwal …

Sufficiency Of Reasons Over Number Of Days Is Considered While Determining Plea Of Condonation Of Delay U/S 37(1)(2) Of Arbitration Act: Delhi HC
3 months, 1 week ago

Sufficiency Of Reasons Over Number Of Days Is Considered While Determining Plea Of Condonation Of Delay U/S 37(1)(2) Of Arbitration Act: Delhi HC

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court Bench of Justice Rekha Palli and Justice Saurabh Banerjee held that the appellant failed to demonstrate any plausible reasons for the delay caused in filing the present appeal. The appeal was also accompanied by two applications, the first seeking condonation of 670 days delay in filing the appeal and the second 591 days delay in re-filing …

Court Can Quash SCNs And Proceedings Under GST Act, Customs Act Or Finance Act On Ground Of Inordinate Delay In Adjudication: Delhi HC
3 months, 2 weeks ago

Court Can Quash SCNs And Proceedings Under GST Act, Customs Act Or Finance Act On Ground Of Inordinate Delay In Adjudication: Delhi HC

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that Show Cause Notices and adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act, 1962, the Finance Act, 1994 or the Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017 cannot be kept pending for years. Court said the phrase cannot be construed as a free-pass and “Ultimately it is incumbent upon the authority to establish that it …

Not Being Aware Of Legal Remedy Not Ground To Condone Delay: Punjab & Haryana High Court
3 months, 3 weeks ago

Not Being Aware Of Legal Remedy Not Ground To Condone Delay: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Live Law  

"It is the duty of all Courts of justice, to take care for the general good of the community, that hard cases do not make bad law,” quoted the Punjab & Haryana High Court while refusing to allow plea for condonation of delay filed asserting lack of proper legal advice.Justice Sumeet Goel said, "A mere bald assertion of not having …

'They Have To Be Given A Chance' : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging SC/ST Reservations In Punjab's Gram Panchayat Posts
3 months, 3 weeks ago

'They Have To Be Given A Chance' : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging SC/ST Reservations In Punjab's Gram Panchayat Posts

Live Law  

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the challenge to the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes in Gram Panchayat elections in village in Ferozepur, Punjab. The bench of CJI Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar was hearing a plea challenging the two circulars issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Ferozepur through which the seat of the sarpanch of the village as …

Special Treatment Cannot Be Given To Govt For Delay In Filing Appeal U/S 37 Of Arbitration Act: Delhi High Court
3 months, 4 weeks ago

Special Treatment Cannot Be Given To Govt For Delay In Filing Appeal U/S 37 Of Arbitration Act: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court bench of Ms. Justice Rekha Palli and Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee has affirmed that just because the appellant is government that doesn't mean that a special treatment will be given while condoning the delay in filing the appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration Act. That In M/s Jaitely Construction Co. v. Union of India the …

Delhi HC To Examine Retrospective Applicability Of S.223 BNSS On Opportunity Of Hearing To Accused In ED's Complaint Filed Post-Enactment
4 months ago

Delhi HC To Examine Retrospective Applicability Of S.223 BNSS On Opportunity Of Hearing To Accused In ED's Complaint Filed Post-Enactment

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court will hear a plea on the issue of retrospective application of Section 223 of the BNSS 2023 in a case where the Enforcement Directorate registered the Enforcement Case Information Report prior to the law's enactment but the Prosecution Complaint was filed and trial court took cognizance on it after the law came into force. The plea …

Time Spent In Bona Fide Proceedings Before Court Without Jurisdiction To Be Excluded When Considering Objection On Limitation In S.11 Plea: Delhi HC
4 months, 2 weeks ago

Time Spent In Bona Fide Proceedings Before Court Without Jurisdiction To Be Excluded When Considering Objection On Limitation In S.11 Plea: Delhi HC

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court bench comprising of Justice Subramonium Prasad, while hearing a Section 11 petition, has held that the petitioner's claim cannot be treated as dead one simply because they spent time on bona fide court proceedings before a court without jurisdiction. The petitioner then filed an application under Section 12 of the Commercial Court Act for pre-litigation mediation …

High Court Allows Inherent Power Under Section 482 CrPC in Domestic Violence Proceedings
4 months, 3 weeks ago

High Court Allows Inherent Power Under Section 482 CrPC in Domestic Violence Proceedings

Live Law  

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has made it clear that the Court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in domestic violence proceedings. The court considered a question regarding the applicability of Section 482 CrPC on proceedings under the Domestic Violence (DV) Act and concluded that Section 482 CrPC is applicable in such cases.

High Court Allows Writ Petition to Challenge District Judge's Interpretation of Law
5 months ago

High Court Allows Writ Petition to Challenge District Judge's Interpretation of Law

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has allowed a writ petition filed under Article 227 to overturn the order of the District Judge dismissing a Section 34 petition. The Court observed that the interpretation of Section 42 of the A&C Act by the District Judge was completely erroneous and that the petition could only have been filed in the High Court. The …

High Court Allows Review Petition, Recalls Direction to Respondents to Appoint Petitioner Due to Low Merit
5 months, 1 week ago

High Court Allows Review Petition, Recalls Direction to Respondents to Appoint Petitioner Due to Low Merit

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court allows a Review Petition filed by the Respondents seeking review of its order directing the Respondent to recall the appointment of a candidate. The Court held that the Respondent was required to issue an appointment letter to the Petitioner as per his respective merit in the respective LDCE, even though the Petitioner was not informed of …

In Absence Of Defendant's Written Request, Trial Courts Cannot On Its Own Extend Time For Filing Written Statement After 30 Days: Madras High Court
6 months ago

In Absence Of Defendant's Written Request, Trial Courts Cannot On Its Own Extend Time For Filing Written Statement After 30 Days: Madras High Court

Live Law  

The Madras High Court has observed that the trial courts should not, on its own, extend the time for filing written statements after the expiry of 30 days. The court added that condoning delay on its own would be contrary to Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC “The trial courts shall not on their own extend the time for filing …

CrPC | S.482 Cannot Be Invoked When Alternative Remedy For Compounding Offenses U/S 320(1) Is Available: Himachal Pradesh High Court
7 months ago

CrPC | S.482 Cannot Be Invoked When Alternative Remedy For Compounding Offenses U/S 320(1) Is Available: Himachal Pradesh High Court

Live Law  

The Himachal Pradesh High Court recently ruled that the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioners had also cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab,, to support their argument that the High Court could quash FIRs even in cases involving compoundable offences. Joshi v. State of Haryana,, to reinforce that the inherent …

Even Though Writ Petitions Have No Limitation Period, They Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time: J&K High Court Dismisses Plea Filed After 26 Yrs
7 months, 3 weeks ago

Even Though Writ Petitions Have No Limitation Period, They Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time: J&K High Court Dismisses Plea Filed After 26 Yrs

Live Law  

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court on Friday ruled that filing representations on stale matters or those barred by limitation cannot create a fresh cause of action or revive a dead claim, even if these representations are considered by competent authorities or the Court directs their consideration. Even though there is no period of limitation provided for filing …

Second Criminal Revision Petition By Same Person Is Barred But High Court Can Entertain Such Plea U/S 482 CrPC: Punjab & Haryana High Court
9 months ago

Second Criminal Revision Petition By Same Person Is Barred But High Court Can Entertain Such Plea U/S 482 CrPC: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Live Law  

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has said that the second criminal revision petition by the same person is barred under the Criminal Procedure Code but the High Court can entertain such plea by exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.Justice Sumeet Goel observed, "A second criminal revision petition filed by the same person is barred in view of statutory …

Petition U/S 483 CrPC Seeking Direction To Family Court For Expeditious Disposal Of S. 125 CrPC Plea Is Maintainable: Allahabad HC
9 months, 2 weeks ago

Petition U/S 483 CrPC Seeking Direction To Family Court For Expeditious Disposal Of S. 125 CrPC Plea Is Maintainable: Allahabad HC

Live Law  

The Allahabad High Court has held that an application filed under Section 483 CrPC seeking a direction to the Family Court to expedite the disposal of an application under Section 125 CrPC, would be maintainable. A bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi clarified that while deciding an application under Section 125 CrPC, the Family Court exercises the jurisdiction of a magistrate. …

Whether Non-Filing Of 'Statement Of Truth' Along With A Petition U/S 34 Of A&C Act Makes The Filing Non-Est? Delhi High Court Refers Question To Larger Bench For Clarification In View Of Conflicting..
11 months, 3 weeks ago

Whether Non-Filing Of 'Statement Of Truth' Along With A Petition U/S 34 Of A&C Act Makes The Filing Non-Est? Delhi High Court Refers Question To Larger Bench For Clarification In View Of Conflicting..

Live Law  

The Single Bench of Justice Prateek Jalan has referred the question 'Whether non-filing of statement of truth with a Challenge Petition would make the filing non-est' to a larger bench in view of conflicting views taken by two Division Benches. The petitioner made the following counter-arguments: Non-filing of statement of truth is only a procedural defect and the effective date …

Application Under Section 29A A&C Can Be Allowed Even After Expiry Of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate: Delhi High Court
11 months, 4 weeks ago

Application Under Section 29A A&C Can Be Allowed Even After Expiry Of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh held that the application under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be allowed even after the expiry of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal. Brief Facts: The Petitioner approached the Delhi High Court seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitration proceedings. Observations by the …

Limitation Act | Doesn't Encompass Long Delays, Condonation Only In Exceptional Cases: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Section 37 A&C Petition
1 year ago

Limitation Act | Doesn't Encompass Long Delays, Condonation Only In Exceptional Cases: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Section 37 A&C Petition

Live Law  

The Allahabad High Court single bench of Justice Shekhar B. Saraf held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not encompass long delays, and condonation can only be granted in exceptional cases where the appellant acted in a bona fide manner and not negligently. Furthermore, the High Court emphasized the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act to …

Party Fails To Challenge Arbitral Award U/s 34 A&C Cannot Approach High Court Under Article 226: Delhi High Court Dismisses Writ Petition
1 year ago

Party Fails To Challenge Arbitral Award U/s 34 A&C Cannot Approach High Court Under Article 226: Delhi High Court Dismisses Writ Petition

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad held that Article 226 of the Constitution of India is an extraordinary remedy and cannot be invoked where a party has failed to invoke other remedies available to it under law. It held that if a party fails to challenge the arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and …

Delay Occurred In Filing Appeal Against Acquittal Under S.378 CrPC Can Be Condoned Under Limitation Act: Supreme Court
1 year, 1 month ago

Delay Occurred In Filing Appeal Against Acquittal Under S.378 CrPC Can Be Condoned Under Limitation Act: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court held that the delay that occurred in preferring an appeal against the acquittal can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Arguments Made by the Parties The appellant-accused contended that the High Court could not have allowed the delay condonation application as the delay occurred in filing the appeal against the acquittal cannot be …

Orders Appealable U/S 14A Of SC/ST Act Can't Be Challenged U/S 482 Of CrPC: Allahabad High Court
1 year, 1 month ago

Orders Appealable U/S 14A Of SC/ST Act Can't Be Challenged U/S 482 Of CrPC: Allahabad High Court

Live Law  

The Allahabad High Court recently observed that in cases where an appeal against an order would lie under Section 14A of the SC/ST Act, 1989, the aggrieved person cannot invoke the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC to challenge the order. The Court also noted that Section 14-A starts with the words “notwithstanding anything contained in …

Section 11 Petition Can Be Filed Only After Failure Of Parties To Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days Of Notice, Limitation Act Applies: Delhi High Court
1 year, 1 month ago

Section 11 Petition Can Be Filed Only After Failure Of Parties To Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days Of Notice, Limitation Act Applies: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court bench, comprising Justice Prathiba M. Singh, held that a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can only be filed after a notice of arbitration has been issued and there has been a failure to make the appointment of an arbitrator within 30 days. The bench held that the limitation period arises …

S.202 CrPC | Magistrate Must Conduct Enquiry Before Summoning Accused Living Beyond Jurisdiction, Can't Solely Rely On Complaint: Bombay HC Full Bench
1 year, 1 month ago

S.202 CrPC | Magistrate Must Conduct Enquiry Before Summoning Accused Living Beyond Jurisdiction, Can't Solely Rely On Complaint: Bombay HC Full Bench

Live Law  

The Bombay High Court's full bench observed that when a Magistrate is conducting a mandatory inquiry under Section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code before summoning an accused who lives outside the court's jurisdiction, the Magistrate shouldn't solely rely on the allegations in the private complaint as it can be used as an instrument of vendetta. “It is… the duty …

Powers U/S 482 CrPC Not Revisional/Appellate, Terms Like "Abuse Of Process" Or "Securing Ends Of Justice" Don't Grant Unfettered Discretion: J&K High Court
1 year, 1 month ago

Powers U/S 482 CrPC Not Revisional/Appellate, Terms Like "Abuse Of Process" Or "Securing Ends Of Justice" Don't Grant Unfettered Discretion: J&K High Court

Live Law  

Reiterating the restricted nature of its inherent power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing criminal complaints the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has observed that this exceptional power cannot be used for detailed evidence evaluation or as a substitute for appeals or revisions. A bench of Justice Javed Iqbal Wani further clarified that terms …

High Court Under S. 482 CrPC Should Not Decide Whether Debt In Cheque Dishonour Case Is Time-Barred: Supreme Court
1 year, 1 month ago

High Court Under S. 482 CrPC Should Not Decide Whether Debt In Cheque Dishonour Case Is Time-Barred: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court recently reiterated that in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the question of whether the underlying debt is time-barred is based on the evidence. “Undoubtedly, the question regarding the time-barred nature of an underlying debt or liability in proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act is a mixed question of law and …

Persons Not Affected By Order Challenged In Revision Petition Not Necessary Parties, Cannot Seek Recourse To Section 401(2) CrPC: Delhi HC
1 year, 3 months ago

Persons Not Affected By Order Challenged In Revision Petition Not Necessary Parties, Cannot Seek Recourse To Section 401(2) CrPC: Delhi HC

Live Law  

While dealing with a plea filed by M/s Bennett Coleman, Justice Amit Sharma of the Delhi High Court recently observed that the words “other persons” under Section 401 CrPC cannot be construed as wide enough to include persons not affected by the order challenged in the revision petition. The petitioners' counsel argued that the words 'accused' or 'other person' in …

S.205 CrPC | Provision For Exemption From Personal Appearance Meant To Avoid Undue Harassment Of Accused: Jharkhand High Court
1 year, 4 months ago

S.205 CrPC | Provision For Exemption From Personal Appearance Meant To Avoid Undue Harassment Of Accused: Jharkhand High Court

Live Law  

The Jharkhand High Court has noted that the intention behind the exemption from personal appearance of accused, as outlined in Section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Code, is to ensure that accused individuals are not subjected to unnecessary harassment and that the complainant does not suffer any undue prejudice. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi observed, “The purpose of exemption under Section …

Deemed The Second Petition As Not Maintainable When It Could Have Been Presented During The Filing Of First Petition
1 year, 4 months ago

Deemed The Second Petition As Not Maintainable When It Could Have Been Presented During The Filing Of First Petition

Live Law  

The Supreme Court on Monday held that a second petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 on grounds that were available for challenge even at the time of filing of the first petition would not be maintainable.A bench of Justice C T Ravikumar and Justice Sanjay Kumar observed that even though there is no absolute bar on a second …

Decide Remission Applications Without Delay : Supreme Court To Chhattisgarh Govt
1 year, 5 months ago

Decide Remission Applications Without Delay : Supreme Court To Chhattisgarh Govt

Live Law  

In a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of India, a case involving the belated grant of permanent remission, the Court urged the Chhattisgarh State Government to ensure that such cases are considered without unnecessary delays, following the government's policy. We hope and trust that the State Government will ensure that there is no delay in considering the cases for …

No Time Limit Stipulated Under Limitation Act For Victim Filing Appeal Against Conviction U/S 372 CrPC: Kerala High Court
1 year, 5 months ago

No Time Limit Stipulated Under Limitation Act For Victim Filing Appeal Against Conviction U/S 372 CrPC: Kerala High Court

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has reiterated that the Limitation Act does not prescribe any statutory period for the victim to prefer an appeal against conviction under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC. Dias relied upon the Division Bench decision in Sobhanakumari K. vs. Santhosh @ Pallan Shaji and observed thus: “In Sobhanakumari K. vs. Santhosh @ Pallan Shaji, a Division …

Statutory Appeal Period Under Customs Act, Appellate Authority Has No Power To Condone Delay: Delhi High Court
1 year, 5 months ago

Statutory Appeal Period Under Customs Act, Appellate Authority Has No Power To Condone Delay: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has held that the appellate authority has no power to allow the appeal to be presented beyond the period of 30 days.The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Dharmesh Sharma has relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Singh Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur & Ors., in which …

CrPC | Revisional Court Can't Act As Appellate Court, Shouldn't Interfere Unless Decision Grossly Flawed: Kerala High Court
1 year, 6 months ago

CrPC | Revisional Court Can't Act As Appellate Court, Shouldn't Interfere Unless Decision Grossly Flawed: Kerala High Court

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has held that the power of a revisional court under Section 397 to 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 cannot be equated to that of an Appellate Court. “Unless the finding of the court, whose decision is sought to be revised, is shown to be perverse or untenable in law or is grossly erroneous or …

Discover Related