Oklahoma death row inmate had three 'last meals.' He's back at Supreme Court in new bid for freedom
The IndependentFor free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails Sign up to our free breaking news emails Sign up to our free breaking news emails SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. “The highest elected law enforcement officer in Oklahoma has said that Richard Glossip did not get a fair trial,” said Knight, a veteran death penalty trial attorney who has consulted on hundreds of capital cases. “As far as I know that’s unprecedented.” Despite Drummond’s doubts about the trial, an Oklahoma appeals court upheld Glossip’s conviction, and the state’s pardon and parole board deadlocked in a vote to grant him clemency. Among those who support Glossip’s efforts to get a new trial are a group of nearly two dozen current and former state and federal prosecutors who wrote in a brief with the court that they were troubled by the actions of law enforcement officers in the case, including what they characterized as the key witness, Sneed, being “coached” to implicate Glossip by a police detective. "And yet, they are now witnessing the spectacle of their case being stalled by the Attorney General for their home state confessing an error where none exists.” Among those who remain convinced of Glossip's guilt in orchestrating Van Treese's murder for hire is former Oklahoma County District Attorney David Prater, who reviewed Glossip's case multiple times and who urged the state's Pardon and Parole Board to reject clemency for him even though the original case was prosecuted by his predecessors.