Reasonable grounds for bail in drug cases are subjective: Punjab and Haryana HC
Hindustan TimesIn an important judgment, the Punjab and Haryana high court has said that the courts have to grant or deny bail to an accused in drugs seizure cases on the basis of its “subjective satisfaction” based on an “objective assessment” of the material brought before it by the prosecution. The bench further recorded that the “reasonable grounds” as envisaged in law would mean credible, plausible grounds for the court to believe that the accused person is not guilty of the alleged offence. The SC, while dealing with Section 37 of the NDPS Act, had held that before granting bail, the court has to have “reasonable grounds” for believing that the accused is “not guilty” of the offence that he has been charged with and that he is unlikely to commit an offence under NDPS Act while on bail again. The high court bench of justice Sandeep Moudgil observed that to record a ‘finding of innocence’ for bail, the court is not called upon to “record a finding of not guilty and it is only required to see if there are reasonable grounds of its belief”. “The law used “three expressions” “the court is satisfied”; “reasonable grounds”, and “believing that the accused is not guilty”, and as such, it does not restrain the court from exercising its jurisdiction,” it said adding that the requirement of recording reasons would not mean to record in writing establishing that an accused is innocent or guilty.