The ugly side to China hosting the Olympics has taken center stage. What happens now?
LA TimesBeijing might have seemed like the best option at the time. “This is really a safe choice,” IOC president Thomas Bach said, predicting the winner could reliably “deliver on its promises.” Seven years later, as the Feb. 4 opening ceremony draws near, Bach and his colleagues still are paying the price for selecting a host country with a reputation for human rights abuses. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared that allowing Beijing to serve as host city this winter “makes a mockery of the Olympic Charter, which states that the Games should seek to foster ‘respect for universal and ethical principles.’” There is historical precedent for politics intruding on the Games. “The Olympic family has put its faith in Beijing again to deliver the athlete-centered, sustainable and economical Games we have promised,” the nation’s bid committee said in a statement. “To be clear, you either have a complete boycott, and don’t send athletes, or you try to change things with useful actions.” :: Facing repeated questions about competing in China — a familiar theme at news conferences this fall — U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee officials stuck to the IOC’s line of reasoning.