Contempt Of Courts Act | Appeal u/s 19 Maintainable Against Directions Regarding Merits Of Dispute Even If There's No Punishment Order: Supreme Court
Live LawOn December 24, 2019, the division bench of the high court stated that the respondent must be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. However, the division bench rejected the Letters Patent Appeal as not being maintainable stating that the appeal would not be maintainable since no punishment was imposed by the single judge and the observations made by the single judge were not construed as crystallising any right in favour of the respondent, as the two requirements under Section 19. The issue that fell before the Supreme Court was whether the Letters Patent Appeal against the order of singe judge was maintainable. The court held that the specific findings of the single judge that the two authorities were guilty of contempt for the willful disobedience of the directions passed by the division bench dated December 24, 2019 and that the respondent would be entitled to promotion needs to be determined in regards to Section 19. In this regard, the court held: “Reading the entirety of the order of the single judge, it is clear that besides holding that the appellants were guilty of contempt of court, there is a crystallized finding that the respondent herein was entitled to promotion as IG, in any event with effect from 2021.” The court held that although the issue of whether the authorities were guilty of contempt is not amenable to Section 19, the finding that the respondent was entitled to promotion to the rank of IG was amenable to an appeal in terms of the law laid down in Midnapore Peoples'Bank Ltd.