Morality and majority: on the Supreme Court verdict on the political imbroglio in Maharashtra
1 year, 8 months ago

Morality and majority: on the Supreme Court verdict on the political imbroglio in Maharashtra

The Hindu  

May 12, 2023 12:20 am | Updated 09:29 am IST It often happens in litigation around political developments that judgments underscore high principles, but extend no relief to those impacted by breach of constitutional norms. The Supreme Court verdict on the political imbroglio in Maharashtra last year is one such. Earlier, by an interim order, the Court had extended the time given to the then rebel Shiv Sena MLAs led by Eknath Shinde from June 27 to July 12 to reply to applications seeking their disqualification for defection. Besides cautioning Governors against treating internal problems of a ruling party as a possible loss of majority, the Court has also clarified that whips and leaders of the party in the House ought to be appointed by the political party, and not the legislature party.

History of this topic

Speaker’s verdict against Supreme Court guidelines, says irate MVA
1 year ago
Maharashtra: Devendra Fadnavis asserts speaker’s authority following SC verdict
1 year, 8 months ago
Maharashtra political crisis verdict: How Supreme Court faulted Speaker, Governor; advised poll body
1 year, 8 months ago
Supreme Court Judgment Maharashtra Crisis Will Decide Whether Democracy Exists In Country Uddhav Thackeray MVA
1 year, 8 months ago
Supreme Court to deliver the judgment in Shiv Sena case tomorrow
1 year, 8 months ago
'Political Morality Different From Constitutional Morality' : SC Dismisses Plea Against Maha Vikas Aghadi Govt In Maharashtra
5 years, 1 month ago
Maharashtra - Urgent Floor Test Ordered To Curtail Horse Trading, To Protect Democratic Values : SC [Read Order]
5 years, 1 month ago

Discover Related