Limits to rugged individualism
The HinduAs the global battle against COVID-19 progresses, it is beginning to reveal deep fault lines in the national psyches of countries that are facing the prospect of high infection rates. Italy, Spain and France, countries that have seen surges in infection cases that have not been witnessed anywhere else outside China, also implemented lockdown measures that were perceived as unavoidable even if draconian. Since COVID-19 started impacting the U.S. in January, President Donald Trump has swung between two contradictory messages: downplaying the risks of the virus hitting the American people and economy badly and hinting that they ought to self-regulate their collective and individual behaviour to slow its spread. When, as the U.S. correspondent of this newspaper, I covered the intensely partisan 2010 debates over former President Barack Obama’s landmark healthcare reform policy, the Affordable Care Act, I saw how it was for many Americans the idea that the government could “mandate” anything, even enrolment in an insurance programme, that was more galling, even more than the idea that it was one political party or the other that was scoring points in Congress over the ensuing nastiness around the bill. Part of the problem that hobbled and seemed to prematurely age Mr. Obama through the struggle to get the ACA passed remains today — under the federalist system of the U.S., States still enjoy disproportionate powers that could, especially over local enforcement questions such as a lockdown, limit Washington’s options.