138 NI Act- Subsequent Filling Of An Unfilled Signed Cheque Is Not An Alteration: SC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 11 months ago

138 NI Act- Subsequent Filling Of An Unfilled Signed Cheque Is Not An Alteration: SC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has held that subsequent filling in of an unfilled signed cheque is not an alteration and even a blank cheque leaf, voluntarily signed and handed over by the accused, which is towards some payment, would attract presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in the absence of any cogent evidence to show that the cheque was not issued in discharge of a debt. The bench comprising Justice R. Banumathi and Justice Indira Banerjee also observed that existence of a fiduciary relationship between the payee of a cheque and its drawer, would not disentitle the payee to the benefit of the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in the absence of evidence of exercise of undue influence or coercion. The main issue considered in Bir Singh vs. Mukesh Kumar was whether the payee of a cheque is disentitled to the benefit of the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, of a cheque duly drawn, having been issued in discharge of a debt or other liability, only because he is in a fiduciary relationship with the person who has drawn the cheque. Referring to various judgments on this aspect, the bench observed that that the onus to rebut the presumption under Section 139 that the cheque has been issued in discharge of a debt or liability is on the accused and the fact that the cheque might be post dated does not absolve the drawer of a cheque of the penal consequences of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

History of this topic

S. 148 NI Act | Signatory Of Cheque Issued By Company Can't Be Directed To Pay Compensation For Suspension Of Sentence : Supreme Court
1 month ago
Complainant's Burden Shifting Under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: High Court Observation
2 months, 1 week ago
High Court Rejects Plea to Dismiss Cheque Bounce Complaint
2 months, 1 week ago
Negotiable Instruments Act | Court Can Compound Offences U/S 147 Even After Conviction: Himachal Pradesh High Court
4 months, 2 weeks ago
[Cheque Dishonour] Accused Often Get Away Due To Lack Of Evidence, Courts Must Acknowledge Friendly Cash Loans Between Parties: Delhi HC
4 months, 2 weeks ago
Discharge Of Debt By Drawer To Be Determined At Trial, Can't Be Ground For Quashing Cheque Bounce Case U/S 138 NI Act: Jharkhand HC
5 months, 4 weeks ago
S.138 NI Act - Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't Be Transferred At The Instance Of Accused : Supreme Court
6 months, 2 weeks ago
Cheques Dishonored With Endorsements 'Insufficient Fund', 'Account Closed', 'Signature Mismatch' Attract S. 138 NI Act: Allahabad HC
7 months, 1 week ago
S.138 NI Act | Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Decision Allowing Amendment Of Cheque Date Mentioned In Complaint
8 months, 1 week ago
S.138 NI Act | Courts Can't Compel Complainant To Give Consent For Compounding, Mere Repayment Won't Absolve Accused : Supreme Court
8 months, 1 week ago
Blank Cheque Voluntarily Signed & Handed Over By Drawer Towards Payment Attracts Presumption Under S.139 NI Act : Supreme Court
10 months, 2 weeks ago
S.138 NI Act | Proceedings For Cheque Dishonour Be Quashed Once Complainant Signs Deed Accepting Amount In Full & Final Settlement: Supreme Court
1 year ago
Notice Under S.138 NI Act Invalid If Omnibus Demand Is Made Without Specifying Cheque Amount : Supreme Court
1 year ago
S.138 NI Act : Supreme Court Slams Accused In Cheque Bounce Case For Not Honouring Undertaking To Pay; Imposes Rs 5 Lakhs Cost
1 year ago
S.138 NI Act | Availability Of Funds In Other Bank Accounts Not A Defence; Cheque Dishonour Relates To Specific Account: Supreme Court
1 year, 1 month ago
S.138 NI Act | Offence Can Be Compounded At Initial Stage Without Complainant's Consent, Provided They Are Duly Compensated
1 year, 1 month ago
S.142 NI Act | Third Party Cannot Prosecute Drawer For Dishonour Of Cheque: Kerala High Court
1 year, 4 months ago
Section 138 NI Act| 'Notice Not Invalid If Other Amount Is Separately Indicated Therein Along With Cheque Amount': Allahabad High Court
1 year, 7 months ago
Merely Being Signatory To A Cheque Does Not Make A Person Guilty Of Offence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court
2 years ago
Section 138 NI Act | Infirmity In Cheque Return Memo Does Not Render Entire Trial As Nullity: Delhi High Court
2 years, 1 month ago
Wife Cannot Be Made Accused in NI Act Case For Cheque Issued By Her Husband: Karnataka High Court
2 years, 2 months ago
No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act If Cheque Is Presented For Full Amount Without Endorsing Part Payment Made By Borrower : Supreme Court
2 years, 2 months ago
Drawer Liable Even If Details Of Cheque Was Filled Up By Some Other Person; Handwriting Expert's Report Cannot Rebut Presumption U/s 139 NI Act: Supreme Court
2 years, 4 months ago
Cheques Dishonored Due To Stop Payment, Account Closed & Signature Mismatch, All Fall Within Ambit Of S.138 NI Act: J&K&L High Court
2 years, 4 months ago
Failure To Raise 'Probable Defence' Or Deny Issuance Of Cheque & Signature Thereupon Strengthens Presumption U/S 139 NI Act: Himachal Pradesh HC
2 years, 4 months ago
S.143A NI Act | Court Not Obliged To Direct Payment Of Interim Compensation In Cheque Bounce Cases: Bombay High Court
2 years, 5 months ago
Undisputed Signatures On The Cheque In Itself Are Not Sufficient For Conviction Under Section 138 Of NI Act: Punjab And Haryana High Court
2 years, 7 months ago
High Courts Should Be Slow To Grant Relief Of Quashing Complaint U/Sec 138 NI Act At A Pre Trial Stage: Supreme Court
2 years, 8 months ago
Section 138 NI Act - Bank Can't Deny Existence Of Account After Returning Cheque With Remark 'Account Frozen' : Supreme Court
2 years, 10 months ago
Section 138 NI Act - Prima Facie Indication That Complaint Is Filed By Authorized Person Of Company Sufficient For Magistrate To Take Cognisance : Supreme Court
2 years, 10 months ago
2021 Supreme Court Digest On Negotiable Instruments Act
3 years ago
Section 138 NI Act Attracted Even In Cases Where Debt Is Incurred After Cheque Is Drawn But Before Presentation: Supreme Court
3 years, 1 month ago
Sec 138 NI Act- Absence Of Salutation In Cheque Irrelevant; Not Ground For Acquittal: Kerala High Court
3 years, 3 months ago
Enlargement of Scope & Changed Judicial Contours of Section 138 NI Act Before SC's Ruling in M/s Laxmi Dyechem v. State of Gujarat
3 years, 6 months ago
Section 138 NI Act : Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Views On Creation Of Additional Courts For Cheque Dishonour Case
3 years, 10 months ago
Dishonour Of Cheques- Blank Cheque Would Attract Presumption U/s 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Admitted: Supreme Court
3 years, 10 months ago
Section 138 NI Act: Cheque Not Valid If Amount Written Is Uncertain, Holds Delhi Court [Read Order]
4 years, 5 months ago
S.138 NI Act: SC Directs RBI To Consider Developing A New Proforma Cheque To Include Purpose Of Payments [Read Order]
4 years, 10 months ago
Complaint U/s 138 NI Act Cannot Be Quashed When Disputed Question Of Facts Are Involved: SC [Read Judgment]
4 years, 10 months ago
NI Act - Presumption Under Section 139 Applies To Guarantor Cheques Also : Kerala HC [Read Judgment]
5 years ago
Section 138 NI Act- 'Amount Due' Not Required To Be Proved As If Proving Debt Before Civil Court: SC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 2 months ago
Section 138 NI Act- No Provision For Consolidation Of Multiple Cases Arising Out Of Single Notice: SC [Read Order]
5 years, 3 months ago
Evidence Adduced To Raise Presumption U/s 139 NI Act Can't Be Discarded Merely On The Ground That There Is No Such Averment In Complaint: SC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 4 months ago
Negotiable Instruments Act: Heavy Burden Cannot Be Placed On The Complainant To Prove The Debt: SC [Read Order]
5 years, 5 months ago
Dishonour Of Cheques: 14 Latest Supreme Court Judgments
5 years, 6 months ago
Section 138 NI Act: Notice Demanding 'Loan Amount' Not Invalid If It Is Same As 'Cheque Amount': SC [Read Order]
5 years, 8 months ago
NI Act- Once The Presumption Under Sec.139 Is Drawn, Complainant Need Not Prove Source Of Fund Till Accused Discharges His Burden [Read Judgment]
5 years, 9 months ago
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Bill: Addressing Dispute Over Cheque Bounce Cases
7 years ago

Discover Related