If Seaspiracy persuades you to stop eating fish in order to save the environment, you are completely missing the point
3 years, 8 months ago

If Seaspiracy persuades you to stop eating fish in order to save the environment, you are completely missing the point

The Independent  

The best of Voices delivered to your inbox every week - from controversial columns to expert analysis Sign up for our free weekly Voices newsletter for expert opinion and columns Sign up to our free weekly Voices newsletter SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. As George Monbiot points out in Seaspiracy, we have an image of the fishing industry “deeply implanted in our minds from childhood” of a “little red boat, chugging along across a sparkling sea with Captain Birdseye at the wheel, with his white beard and his twinkly blue eyes”. But the argument that we should stop eating fish for the sake of the environment is a human-centric one that ignores the true victims here – the fish themselves. Anatomically, physiologically and biologically, the pain system in fish is virtually the same as in birds and mammals.” A European Union scientific panel has also found that fish do experience pain and fear. Why boast that you’ve stopped using plastic straws to save fish when you won’t stop eating fish to save fish?

History of this topic

Netflix Seaspiracy: 7 biggest claims
3 years, 8 months ago
Seaspiracy: Viewers react to controversial Netflix documentary about global fishing industry
3 years, 8 months ago
Seaspiracy review: A shocking indictment of the commercial fishing industry
3 years, 8 months ago

Discover Related