Judge says lethal injection doesn’t violate rights of man on death row, avoids firing squad question
ATLANTA — A federal judge has ruled against a man on Georgia’s death row who argued that lethal injection could cause him excruciating pain and suggested a firing squad as an alternative. U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee ruled Thursday that Nance had failed to prove that and, as a result, Boulee didn’t weigh in on whether a firing squad is a feasible alternative. Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the majority opinion that in challenging Georgia’s execution method he was “not confined to proposing a method authorized by the executing State’s law.” There is no reason to believe that amending state law to allow executions by firing squad would be a “substantial impediment” to carrying out the death sentence, she wrote. But because Nance failed to show that his medical conditions would cause him to suffer severe pain during a lethal injection, the judge said he had “no need to address” the firing squad argument.
Discover Related

Why the US is executing a convict by firing squad for the first time in 15 years

South Carolina Supreme Court rules state death penalty including firing squad is legal

Judge dismisses lawsuit over upcoming lethal injection

Judge says SC electric chair, firing squad unconstitutional

South Carolina Supreme Court temporarily halts planned execution by firing squad
