Fresh Application Filed In SC Seeking Clarification On Retirement Age Of CESTAT Members [Read Application]
An Intervention Application and Application for Clarifications/Directions has been filed in the Supreme Court in the case of Kudrat Sandhu vs. Union of India, which challenges the constitutional validity of the Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities Rules, 2017.The two Applications have been filed by Rajesh Kumar. An Intervention Application and Application for Clarifications/Directions has been filed in the Supreme Court in the case of Kudrat Sandhu vs. Union of India, which challenges the constitutional validity of the Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities Rules, 2017. Ashish Goel, Advocate, the counsel for Rajesh Kumar Singh explained: “The Supreme Court in Kudrat Sandhu, while staying the Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities Rules, 2017, stated that the tenure of Members of Tribunals shall be for a period of five years or maximum age fixed under the old Rules. This contravenes the Supreme Court’s Order.” Goel said that the Applicant is praying before the Supreme Court to clarify that the age of retirement of CESTAT Members be as per old Rules, that is, 62 years.
![Retirement Age Of CESTAT Members Is 62 Years: SC Clarifies [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Petition to increase retirement age of judges turned down by the Supreme Court
Petition to increase retirement age of judges turned down by the Supreme Court
Discover Related
Presiding Officer Vacancy At Special Tribunal, Talcher [Apply Now]
Old central govt retirees won't benefit from new Pay Commission
Old central govt retirees may not benefit from new Pay Commission: Experts
Bombay High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 10 – March 16, 2025
Amid CEC appointment controversy, SC defers hearing on pleas against 2023 law
CEC appointment hearing highlights: Supreme Court postpones hearing on CEC/EC appointment law to March 19
Modi, Shah move to appoint CEC disrespectful: Rahul