
Comity Of Courts Not Weapon To Leave Litigant Remediless: Bombay High Court Stays Singapore Court Order Against Shaadi.com CEO Anupam Mittal
Live LawThe Bombay High Court has temporarily stayed the enforcement of an anti-suit permanent injunction order issued by the Singapore High Court against Anupam Mittal, the founder and CEO of Shaadi.com. The Singapore High Court order restrained Mittal from proceeding with his petition before the National Company Law Tribunal alleging oppression and mismanagement of People Interactive Pvt. On March 15, 2021, Westbridge served the plaintiff with an anti-suit injunction passed by the Singapore High Court restraining Mittal from proceeding with the NCLT petition and asserting that the disputes were contractual and arbitrable in Singapore, as per the SHA. Mittal filed the present suit on March 18, 2021, seeking a permanent injunction against enforcing the anti-suit injunction and also initiated proceedings in the Singapore High Court to vacate the anti-suit injunction.
History of this topic

Court Has Power To Grant Anti-Enforcement Injunction Against Proceedings In Foreign Court Which Threaten Arbitral Process Initiated In India: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Delhi High Court Reserves Order On Plea By Future Group Challenging Orders Of Singapore Tribunal Refusing To Terminate Arbitration Proceedings
Live Law
Future v. Amazon: Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Singapore Based Tribunal's Order Halting Reliance Deal
Live Law![Delhi HC Restrains Xiaomi From Enforcing Wuhan Court's Anti Suit Injunction Order Against Interdigital Technology Corporation [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Delhi HC Restrains Xiaomi From Enforcing Wuhan Court's Anti Suit Injunction Order Against Interdigital Technology Corporation [Read Order]
Live LawDiscover Related




















![Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: February 2025 [Citations 119- 251]](/static/images/error.jpg)


























