Comity Of Courts Not Weapon To Leave Litigant Remediless: Bombay High Court Stays Singapore Court Order Against Shaadi.com CEO Anupam Mittal
1 year, 6 months ago

Comity Of Courts Not Weapon To Leave Litigant Remediless: Bombay High Court Stays Singapore Court Order Against Shaadi.com CEO Anupam Mittal

Live Law  

The Bombay High Court has temporarily stayed the enforcement of an anti-suit permanent injunction order issued by the Singapore High Court against Anupam Mittal, the founder and CEO of Shaadi.com. The Singapore High Court order restrained Mittal from proceeding with his petition before the National Company Law Tribunal alleging oppression and mismanagement of People Interactive Pvt. On March 15, 2021, Westbridge served the plaintiff with an anti-suit injunction passed by the Singapore High Court restraining Mittal from proceeding with the NCLT petition and asserting that the disputes were contractual and arbitrable in Singapore, as per the SHA. Mittal filed the present suit on March 18, 2021, seeking a permanent injunction against enforcing the anti-suit injunction and also initiated proceedings in the Singapore High Court to vacate the anti-suit injunction.

India Singapore Court Bombay High Court Courts High Nclt Sha Westbridge Mittal Mismanagement Oppression Injunction Order People Interactive Singapore High Court  remediless  weapon  litigant  antisuit  court  singapore  leave  high  oppression  nclt  mittal  injunction  order  stays  westbridge  mismanagement  shaadicom

History of this topic

Court Has Power To Grant Anti-Enforcement Injunction Against Proceedings In Foreign Court Which Threaten Arbitral Process Initiated In India: Delhi High Court
6 months, 3 weeks ago

Court Has Power To Grant Anti-Enforcement Injunction Against Proceedings In Foreign Court Which Threaten Arbitral Process Initiated In India: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court bench of Justice C. Hari Shankar has held that when proceedings in a foreign court, or a decree issued by a foreign court, threaten the arbitral process that may be initiated in India, the court has the authority under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to restrain the party from continuing with the foreign proceedings or …

Delhi High Court Reserves Order On Plea By Future Group Challenging Orders Of Singapore Tribunal Refusing To Terminate Arbitration Proceedings
3 years, 2 months ago

Delhi High Court Reserves Order On Plea By Future Group Challenging Orders Of Singapore Tribunal Refusing To Terminate Arbitration Proceedings

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court will tomorrow pronounce orders on the plea filed by Future Group challenging the two orders passed by Singapore Arbitration Tribunal deferring hearing in it's plea seeking termination of arbitration proceedings after final hearing from January 5 to 8, 2022. Amazon invoked arbitration proceedings in Singapore to halt Future Retail's deal with the Reliance group. Background Justice …

Future v. Amazon: Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Singapore Based Tribunal's Order Halting Reliance Deal
3 years, 4 months ago

Future v. Amazon: Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Singapore Based Tribunal's Order Halting Reliance Deal

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court on Friday rejected the plea filed by Future Group seeking an ad interim stay on the order passed by a Singapore based Arbitration Tribunal, refusing to interfere with the Emergency Award restraining it to continue with the Reliance deal.The Singapore International Arbitration Centre last week had rejected Future Group's plea to vacate the interim stay on …

Delhi HC Restrains Xiaomi From Enforcing Wuhan Court's Anti Suit Injunction Order Against Interdigital Technology Corporation [Read Order]
4 years, 5 months ago

Delhi HC Restrains Xiaomi From Enforcing Wuhan Court's Anti Suit Injunction Order Against Interdigital Technology Corporation [Read Order]

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court, on Friday, restrained Chinese electronics giant, Xiaomi from enforcing an anti-suit injunction order passed by Wuhan Intermediate People's Court against Interdigital Technology Corporation.The order of the Wuhan Court, directly negates the jurisdiction of this Court, and infringes the authority of this Court to exercise jurisdiction in accordance with the laws of. The Delhi High Court, on …

Discover Related