#Aadhaar Mandatory For ITR From July 1, As SC Ordered Only Partial Relief: CBDT
The Central Board of Direct Taxes on Saturday has issued a clarification regarding the quoting of Aadhaar for filing IT Returns, on the basis of Supreme Court Judgment in the Binoy Viswam Case.In a press release, the CBDT explained the effect of Supreme Court Judgment as follows; From July 1, 2017 onwards, every person eligible to obtain Aadhaar must quote their Aadhaar. The Central Board of Direct Taxes on Saturday has issued a clarification regarding the quoting of Aadhaar for filing IT Returns, on the basis of Supreme Court Judgment in the Binoy Viswam Case. In a press release, the CBDT explained the effect of Supreme Court Judgment as follows; From July 1, 2017 onwards, every person eligible to obtain Aadhaar must quote their Aadhaar number or their Aadhaar Enrolment ID number for filing of Income Tax Returns as well as for applications for PAN; Everyone who has been allotted permanent account number as on the 1st day of July, 2017, and who has Aadhaar number or is eligible to obtain Aadhaar number, shall intimate his Aadhaar number to income tax authorities for the purpose of linking PAN with Aadhaar; However, for non-compliance of the above point No., only a partial relief by the Court has been given to those who do not have Aadhaar and who do not wish to obtain Aadhaar for the time being, that their PAN will not be cancelled so that other consequences under the Income Tax Act for failing to quote PAN may not arise. In the Binoy Viswam Judgment Supreme Court on Friday upheld the constitutional validity of S.139AA of the Income Tax Act, subject to the outcome of the Constitution Bench’s decision in the main Aadhaar Matter.
Discover Related

MoU signed between the Supreme Courts of India and Nepal

Supreme Court junks plea for 100% manual counting of VVPAT slips during polls

Trinamool’s Abhishek Banerjee serves legal notice to ISF MLA Nawsad Siddique

Delhi MLA Amanatullah Khan Moves Supreme Court Challenging Waqf Amendment Bill

Delhi MLA Amanatullah Khan Moves Supreme Court Challenging Waqf Amendment Bill
![Madras High Court Monthly Digest - March 2025 [Citations 81-122]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Madras High Court Monthly Digest - March 2025 [Citations 81-122]

Madras High Court quashes DVAC chargesheet against T.N. Minister I. Periyasamy

Madras High Court refuses to quash FIR against Periyar University Vice-Chancellor

India’s mop-up of direct taxes signals its economic strength
![Kerala High Court Monthly Digest: March 2025 [Citations: 144 - 221]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Kerala High Court Monthly Digest: March 2025 [Citations: 144 - 221]

Court pulls up CBI for ‘fabricating evidence’ in justice Yadav case

Odisha govt fails to recover ₹3,966 crore fine imposed by SC for illegal mining: CAG

After court order, Anil Ambani withdraws plea challenging tax department action

Court adjourns hearing on NCP MLA Chhagan Bhujbal's release in corruption case

Bombay High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 24 – March 30, 2025

I-T Dept. imposes ₹944 crore penalty on IndiGo; airline to contest order

IndiGo vows to contest ₹944 cr tax penalty, calls I-T dept’s order ‘erroneous and frivolous’
