Supreme Court hits right notes in landmark Aadhaar verdict; Critics’ concerns met, but govt won’t be unhappy
6 years, 3 months ago

Supreme Court hits right notes in landmark Aadhaar verdict; Critics’ concerns met, but govt won’t be unhappy

Firstpost  

In as much as these provisions were held to be symptomatic of a “surveillance state”, the Supreme Court judgment seems to have corroborated the views of Aadhaar critics who held such linking of services with biometric data an assault on privacy of citizens. Circular dated 23.03.2017, thus, cannot be held to be a law and direction to re-verification of all existing mobile subscribers through Aadhaar based e-KYC cannot be held to be backed by law, hence cannot be upheld.” During a press conference held shortly after the verdict, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said: “One of the purposes behind a judicial review is to figure out the dos and don’ts… the Supreme Court has upheld the core and principle areas of the legislation but has also made some observations. Insofar as authentication is concerned, the respondents rightly pointed out that there are sufficient safeguard mechanisms.” On right to privacy, which has been deemed in 2017 by the Supreme Court as a fundamental right, the majority judgment observed that existence of the Aadhaar Act and delivery of welfare benefits fulfil the requirements of law and legitimacy of aim, and the scheme also achieves the third necessary condition of “proportionality” by ensuring that targeted beneficiaries and correctly identified and a balance is achieved between two competing fundamental rights: right to privacy on the one hand, and right to food, shelter and employment on the other. The Aadhaar Act ensures human dignity and the right to life and liberty, hence there would be no reasonable expectation of privacy and autonomy.” To the contention from critics that Aadhaar may conversely lead to exclusion of benefits for those who do not possess the document, the Supreme Court observed that “insofar as the argument based on probabilistic system of Aadhaar, leading to ‘exclusion’ is concerned, the authority has claimed that biometric accuracy is 99.76 percent and the petitioners have also proceeded on that basis. Would it not lead to their exclusion?” To this enlightened observation, the court also added: “We also clarify that no child shall be denied benefit of any of these schemes if, for some reasons, she is not able to produce the Aadhaar number and the benefit shall be given by verifying the identity on the basis of any other documents.” The judgment therefore has also been interpreted by the BJP as a “victory for India and the pro-poor Modi government”, and the party highlighted the part where the court observes that “insofar as Section 2 is concerned, which defines ‘resident’, the apprehension expressed by the petitioners was that it should not lead to giving Aadhaar card to illegal immigrants.

History of this topic

'Will take a call..': Supreme Court on forming bench to examine passing laws as money bill
6 months ago
Expanding Aadhaar to private entities is risky
1 year, 7 months ago
Money Bill Issue : CJI DY Chandrachud Says Will Consider Forming 7-Judge Bench
1 year, 8 months ago
Supreme Court Of India Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Aadhaar-Voter ID Card Linkage
2 years, 2 months ago
SC to Examine Plea Challenging Centre's Decision to Link Electoral Roll Data with Aadhaar
2 years, 2 months ago
SC to examine plea challenging decision to link electoral roll data with Aadhaar
2 years, 2 months ago
'Can't Be Sustained': Delhi High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Satyendar Jain Under Benami Act [Read Order]
2 years, 3 months ago
DC Edit | Volte-face and quick fixes can’t protect Indians’ data
2 years, 7 months ago
Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Mandatory Aadhar Requirement For Availing Ration Under National Food Security Act
2 years, 9 months ago
Bill to link voter ID, Aadhaar card passed in Lok Sabha amid Opposition uproar
3 years ago
BJP calls Congress's objection to Aadhaar-Voter ID linking a case of hypocrisy
3 years ago
Aadhaar and Voter ID link: Joining the strands of the debate
3 years ago
Constitutional Error To Hold At This Stage That No Ground Exists To Review Aadhaar Verdict: Justice Chandrachud Dissents
3 years, 11 months ago
Breaking- Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions Challenging Aadhaar Verdict, Justice Chandrachud Dissents
3 years, 11 months ago
Supreme Court to deliver judgment today on pleas seeking review of verdict upholding Aadhaar validity
4 years ago
Aadhaar Verdict Review: SC Judgement on Pleas Against Aadhaar Scheme Validity Tomorrow
4 years ago
Supreme Court To Consider Review Petitions Against Aadhaar Verdict Tomorrow
4 years ago
Aadhaar Review : Open Court Hearing Sought Citing Observations In 'Rojer Mathew' & 'Sabarimala Reference' Cases
4 years, 7 months ago
PAN Not To Be Declared Inoperative Due To Non-Linking With Aadhaar Until Aadhaar Act Attains Finality: Gujarat HC [Read Order]
4 years, 11 months ago
SC seeks govt’s response on use of Aadhaar as ID
5 years, 1 month ago
Supreme Court seeks government reply to plea on Aadhaar data use by private firms
5 years, 1 month ago
The Tribunals Judgment – I: A Course Correction On The Money Bill
5 years, 2 months ago
Supreme Court to verify the correctness of the Aadhaar Judgment
5 years, 2 months ago
Firstpost Editor's Picks: INX Media case, Congress in Assam, Aadhar-social media linking; today's must-read stories
5 years, 4 months ago
Aadhaar bill passed, Ordinance on its use not valid anymore: Centre tells High Court
5 years, 6 months ago
Penalty, jail term to private entities storing Aadhaar data
5 years, 6 months ago
Aadhaar Amendment Bill passed in Lok Sabha
5 years, 6 months ago
Congress calls Aadhaar Bill 'political plagiarism' in Lok Sabha; says it breaches Fundamental Rights
5 years, 6 months ago
Aadhaar Bill seeking its use as ID to open bank accounts passes in Lok Sabha
5 years, 6 months ago
Challenge Against Aadhaar Ordinance: Delhi HC Seeks Centre's Response
5 years, 9 months ago
Was the Govt Right to Use Ordinance Route for Aadhaar Amendments?
5 years, 10 months ago
The Aadhaar ordinance raises serious constitutional concerns
5 years, 10 months ago
Cabinet clears voluntary use of Aadhaar as identity proof
5 years, 10 months ago
Union Cabinet Approves Promulgation Of Aadhaar (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019
5 years, 10 months ago
Justice AK Sikri declines honorary judicial position: Here is how lies were spread about his appointment
6 years ago
A renewed attack on privacy: on Aadhaar Bill
6 years ago
Opinion | The Aadhaar amendment and private sector access
6 years ago
Lok Sabha passes Bill to amend Aadhaar Act
6 years ago
Lok Sabha passes bill to amend Aadhaar act
6 years ago
Aadhaar Amendment Bill grants broad, vague powers; privacy needs to be priority
6 years ago
The Aadhaar Amendment Bill Contravenes Privacy Judgment Of SC
6 years ago
The Aadhaar and Other Laws Bill introduced in Lok Sabha
6 years ago
Companies violating Aadhaar Act provisions may be fined up to Rs1 crore
6 years ago
Review petition filed in SC seeking re-examination of its Aadhaar verdict
6 years ago
Jairam Ramesh seeks review of Aadhaar verdict upholding passage as Money Bill
6 years ago
Review Petition Filed In SC Against Constitution Bench’s Aadhaar Judgment [Read Petition]
6 years ago
Review petition in Supreme Court against its Aadhaar verdict
6 years ago
Aadhaar data breach: HC grants more time to UIDAI to file response
6 years, 1 month ago
Activists unhappy with SC's Aadhaar Act order on social benefits
6 years, 2 months ago
The Money Bill Cloud Persists Over The Aadhaar Act
6 years, 3 months ago

Discover Related