Rules For Listing Violated In Many Cases In Supreme Court : Prashant Bhushan
Live LawSpeaking during the seminar hosted by Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms at the Indian Society of International Law, New Delhi, Advocate-on-Record and CJAR Convener Prashant Bhushan recently voiced an opinion that even though Master of Roster power is stated to be subject to certain rules which even Chief Justice of India cannot violate, the same are being routinely. Speaking during the seminar hosted by Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms at the Indian Society of International Law, New Delhi, Advocate-on-Record and CJAR Convener Prashant Bhushan recently voiced an opinion that even though Master of Roster power is stated to be subject to certain rules which even Chief Justice of India cannot violate, the same are being routinely violated in listing and allocation of cases. Abuse of Master of Roster power Recalling the 2018 conference by 4 judges of the top Court, complaining about "misuse of power" by the then Chief Justice, he claimed that it was not merely politically "sensitive cases" which were being assigned in a particular manner, but also cases involving judges themselves. sometimes if the Senior judge has retired after issuing notice, you don't know where to mention it.it says that you have to mention it only before the Chief Justice.if there is a clear quorum with the Senior Judge being there, then yes you can mention it before that particular Bench.but otherwise you have to mention it before the Chief Justice.the Chief Justice is often sitting in a Constitution Bench and he hears no mentioning while he's sitting in a Constitution Bench.so sometimes fresh urgent matters just cannot be listed.I find this quite amazing that there are several days sequentially when the Chief Justice is in a Constitution Bench and the matter just can't be listed".