Legitimate dissent can’t be equated with sedition: Rajasthan HC
Hindustan TimesThe Rajasthan High Court, emphasising that legitimate dissent cannot be equated with sedition or anti-national acts, has quashed an FIR registered against Sikh preacher Tejender Pal Singh Timma who was charged under Sections 152 and 197 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly endangering India’s unity and sovereignty through social media posts. According to legal news website LiveLaw, the court emphasised proper judicial oversight and clear guidelines were essential for interpreting terms like “disharmony” and “ill-will” to prevent the law from becoming “a tool for oppression or suppression of dissent.” The provision was not supposed to be seen as a sword against dissent but as a shield required for national security, the report added. However, for such expressions to be deemed criminal, there must be demonstrable public repercussions or substantive evidence indicating deliberate malicious intent.” The court also addressed procedural lapses in the investigation, noting that no incriminating evidence was presented from the petitioner’s mobile data or social media accounts. Justice Monga concluded by highlighting the constitutional balance between individual rights and public order, stating that Section 152 “must be interpreted in conjunction with the constitutional rights to free speech and expression to ensure it does not infringe on democratic freedoms.”