When Extrapolation Fails Us: Incorrect Mathematical Conjectures
It is well-known that our intuition is not perfect. This sort of situation seems to be embodied in a Quora question that I recently came across: What is an example of a conjecture that was proven wrong for "very large" numbers? Essentially, the questioner was interested in situations where a mathematical conjecture appeared true, but fails only with the application of advanced computational power as cases far beyond human abilities are tested. Another example is a conjecture from Euler: The 17th century Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler claimed that there are no whole number solutions to an equation not dissimilar to Fermat’s equation: Euler’s equation: x4 + y4 + z4 = w4 For two hundred years nobody could prove Euler’s conjecture, but on the other hand nobody could disprove it by finding a counter-example. Then in 1988 Noam Elkies of Harvard University discovered the following solution: 2,682,4404 + 15,365,6394 + 18,796,7604 = 20,615,6734 Despite all the previous evidence, Euler’s conjecture turned out to be false.
Discover Related

Internet is scratching its head while trying to solve this tricky maths puzzle, can you crack it?

Mathematicians Just Debunked the ‘Bunkbed Conjecture’

Viral Brain Teaser: Calling all maths whizzes to solve this puzzle

A Teenager Solved a Stubborn Prime Number ‘Look-Alike’ Riddle

If you can solve one of these 6 major math problems, you'll win a $1 million prize

Humans gaming find intuitive solutions faster than AI algorithms for physics puzzles

ABC conjecture: proved but still out of reach?
