Supreme Court Seeks Explanation From Registry On Why Counter Affidavit Filed By Non-Party Was Accepted
Live LawThe Supreme Court on November 14 sought an explanation from the Registrar how a party was able to file a counter-affidavit when its application seeking impleadment was not allowed by the Court. A bench of Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma was hearing a Special Leave Petition filed against the May 17 order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court rejection of the anticipatory bail of the petitioner for the offences under Sections 324 read with 34 and Sections 323 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code. A vacation bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Sandeep Mehta on June 7 had granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR No.07/2024 dated February 17. On this, the Court observed: "Registry is directed to explain as to how, such counter affidavit from the proposed respondent complainant, who is not a party, could be accepted."